Health and Truth

Health and Truth How should the Christian church respond to Lockdowns, unethical practices and medical tyranny?

Quite simply, we begin with the foundation of God's word; then, building upon that basis, we pursue transparent, principled science and medicine.

The GMC is not fit for purposeOpen letter to Mr Wes Streeting, Secretary of State for Health and Social CareHART Mar 19,...
31/03/2026

The GMC is not fit for purpose
Open letter to Mr Wes Streeting, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
HART Mar 19, 2026

Joint Open Letter from:

Children’s Covid Vaccines Advisory Council (CCVAC)
Doctors for Patients UK (DfPUK)
Health Advisory and Recovery Team (HART)
UK Medical Freedom Alliance (UKMFA)

To: Rt Hon Wes Streeting, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
Dr Jayne Chidgey-Clark, National Guardian, National Guardian’s Office
Suzanne McCarthy, Independent Chair of the National Guardian’s Office

12 March 2026

Dear Mr Streeting

Re: The GMC is Failing in its Duty to Protect the Public and Needs Urgent Reform

In recent years, the General Medical Council (GMC) has instigated investigations and Fitness to Practice cases which appear to prioritise protecting Public Health policy and the ‘reputation of the profession’ above public safety. The Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) is supposedly independent of the GMC, yet both bodies have shown an inclination to investigate and sanction doctors who question the status quo. The MPTS’s duty is to apply the minimum sanction required to protect the public, yet their decisions have varied wildly from overly harsh to recklessly lax.

We are deeply concerned about the abuse of the GMC referral process to silence whistleblowers. And by the failure of the NHS Speaking Up service to provide meaningful support to whistleblowers who speak out against NHS or government policy. Resulting in a culture of fear among doctors, making them reluctant to speak out about patient harm, with serious implications for patient safety. These issues were highlighted in the Cumberlege Report ‘First Do No Harm’ and, more recently, by the Infected Blood Inquiry. And confirmed in May 2024 by the GMC Chair, Professor Carrie MacEwen, in a letter to doctors stating,

“[people] have taken actions to silence whistleblowers, including threatening referral to the GMC. We are of course aware that referrals to us are sometimes used to intimidate… We are continuously assessing… whether further interventions are needed to prevent retaliatory or weaponised referrals.”

It appears that politically motivated cases are being brought against doctors expressing concerns about Covid vaccine policies or safety. The GMC’s continued actions against such doctors, including erasure for raising patient safety concerns, is in stark contrast to recent GMC cases of serious s*xual misconduct, where suspension or even just a warning have been applied.

Cases Illustrating Inconsistent MPTS Decisions

A. Minimal sanctions for serious s*xual offences

i.Rape - Dr Aloaye Foy-Yamah suspended for 1 year)

ii.Child po*******hy - Dr Girling was allowed to continue working for 15 months while under police investigation for having indecent images of children. He was only struck off after he was convicted.

iii. Child po*******hy - Urologist Paul Sturch received a suspended sentence in court despite downloading images of abuse in children as young as 4-years of age. He was subsequently suspended by the GMC but, incredibly, has still not been erased.

iv. Sexual activity with another staff member while neglecting clinical duties - Anaesthetist Dr Suhail Anjum received a warning (not even a suspension) for having s*x with a colleague in an adjacent operating theatre, while his patient was still on the operating table undergoing surgery.

B. Whistleblower doctors struck off for criticising lockdowns or reporting Covid vaccine harm

i. Sam White was erased from the GMC register after raising concerns about Covid policies and vaccine safety on a face-to-camera online video and interviews on independent media channels. No patient complaints were ever made against him.

ii. Anne McCloskey worked on the Covid front line during 2020. In 2021 she spoke out publicly after seeing Covid vaccine injuries in her practice, which resulted in the GMC striking her off. She was even briefly imprisoned for refusing to pay a fine for breaching lockdown rules.

iii. Daniel Armstrong was also erased for posting a self-recorded interview on X.

iv. David Cartland has been mercilessly persecuted by the GMC. After witnessing serious vaccine injuries in his GP practice, he spoke out against vaccinating children and pregnant women. Told by the GMC that his views on Covid vaccines were irrelevant (despite this being the primary allegation against Drs White, Armstrong and McCloskey), they instead accused him of harassing other doctors on social media. Despite the GMC case quoting the Protection against Harassment Act, no police interview or criminal prosecution has ever taken place. In his MPTS tribunal hearing, Dr Cartland’s witnesses were refused and much of his own statement deemed inadmissible, in what can only be described as a ‘Kangaroo Court’ hearing.

Vexatious Claims Enabled by the GMC

Dr Sarah Myhill has been reported to the GMC by other doctors (never by her patients) on over 40 occasions over 25 years. On every occasion, when she represented herself, the case was dismissed. On one occasion the GMC lawyer was heard to comment that “the problem with the Myhill cases is that all the patients are better and none will give witness statements [against her].”

At a recent hearing, which Dr Myhill did not attend, she was finally suspended. Since then, she has successfully defended herself against another GMC complaint, made while she was suspended. Ironically, Dr Myhill requested removal from the GMC Register several years ago as she practises naturopathic medicine. A request refused by the GMC, who continue to pursue her in this vexatious way.

Failure to Follow Due Process Creating a “Kangaroo Court”

We are aware of cases where the GMC has refused to hear testimony from ‘defence’ witnesses and deemed large amounts of contextual evidence inadmissible, thus denying the accused a fair trial and justice. This was particularly apparent in the recent case brought against Dr David Cartland, where all six defence witnesses were rejected. Dr Sarah Myhill was also denied the opportunity to bring witnesses at her appeal hearing in the High Court.

For decades, the Bolam principle formed the foundation of how courts assess clinical decision-making. Upholding a doctor’s right to employ non-standard medical care, if a body of doctors supported this practice. More recently, care has become increasingly directed by protocols, and doctors acting in good faith, in the best interests of their individual patient, are no longer automatically supported or protected.

In a criminal court, there is a presumption of innocence; guilt must be established ‘beyond reasonable doubt’. However, the MPTS is only required to base their decision on balance of probability, making doctors who speak or act against the orthodoxy very vulnerable to political and personal targeting.

A doctor with a 30-year unblemished record can lose their licence to practice for speaking out against a public health measure, following a single, anonymous complaint; despite not a single patient harmed and despite thousands of doctors across the world sharing their concerns and large numbers of peer-reviewed publications supporting their observations. This is inconsistent with the General Medical Council’s overriding statutory objective of protecting, promoting and maintaining the health and safety of the public.

Bias and Overreach

MPTS panels have demonstrated an assumption that government policy is always right and that anyone questioning policy is, therefore, spreading misinformation which constitutes a risk to public health. This is inherently biased and dangerous, ignoring the possibility that these doctors could be raising legitimate and real patient safety concerns, and protecting public health.

MPTS panels have demonstrated the misguided belief that whistleblowers undermine public trust in the medical profession. Yet the doctors mentioned in this letter have strong public support, receiving numerous messages of thanks for their courageous stand.

In addition, justice is not imparted equally by the GMC. For example, Dr Cartland has been the target of numerous hostile tweets, including death threats, from other registered doctors. Yet, despite these doctors being reported to the GMC and the police, they have refused to investigate.

Working with other Agencies to Further Punish Whistleblower Doctors

Apparently not satisfied by removing his registration and livelihood, the GMC/MPTS also reported Dr Cartland to the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS), who put him on their Vulnerable Adults and Children Barred Lists. This devastating, disproportionate and unjust sanction will detrimentally impact every aspect of his life and cannot be a fair consequence for arguing with other doctors on social media and writing five letters supporting patient choice against vaccination. It can only be described as a witch hunt.

There has been no demonstration of resulting harm that meets, or even comes close to, the criteria described on an approved DBS checking website:

“To end up on a barred list, the person must have committed a particularly serious crime that suggests that they will forever be a risk to children or vulnerable adults. The most common type of crimes that land people on a barred list are s*xual offences or violence against children or vulnerable adults.”

DBS is required by law to accept any ‘finding of fact’ by the GMC, through the MPTS tribunal, as reliable fact. Yet those added to the Barred Lists following a criminal conviction, are based on a decision ‘beyond reasonable doubt’. Whereas an MPTS ruling is only based on ‘balance of probabilities’, a far lower burden of proof.

In recent correspondence from the DBS, a reason cited for putting that doctor on the Barred List was his belief that he was entitled to ‘ignore and flout policies and protocols..’ by not recommending Covid vaccines to his patients. This extremely concerning statement implies that questioning the safety of, or not recommending, Covid vaccines somehow make a doctor a danger to patients more widely. Policies and guidelines are there to help guide doctors to make decisions in their patients’ best interest and are not binding. Deciding to treat a patient outside an NHS guideline is not and never has been a safeguarding matter.

Decisions Pending

Dr Aseem Malhotra is a senior cardiologist who initially strongly supported the Covid vaccine rollout. However, in 2022, after observing serious cardiovascular harm from the gene-based products in his practice, he spoke out publicly to raise his concerns. As a result, he was reported to the GMC, who initially decided not to investigate. However, following aggrieved junior doctor Matt Kneale’s legal action against the GMC, they reopened Dr Malhotra’s fitness to practice case. Three years on he is still awaiting a decision. Again, there has not been a single complaint regarding his clinical practice.

In a speech at the 2025 Reform UK Annual Conference, Dr Malhotra highlighted a concerning rise in cancer in young patients since 2021 adding, controversially, “it is highly likely that the covid vaccines have been a significant factor in the cancers of members of the Royal Family”. Within hours, Wes Streeting was quoted “It is shockingly irresponsible for Nigel Farage to give a platform to these poisonous lies….Farage should apologise and sever all ties with this dangerous extremism”.

There is a wealth of published real-world data supporting Dr Malhotra’s concerns of a worrying recent increase in cancers. Many published papers detail multiple mechanisms by which mRNA vaccines could be a contributory cause, making this connection biologically plausible. It is deeply disturbing to hear a doctor raising patient safety concerns being described as “dangerous extremism”. The GMC must defend and uphold doctors’ right to freedom of speech and their professional duty to raise patient safety concerns.

Conflicts of interest and misinformation from Government sources

Doctors questioning Covid vaccine safety were vilified and punished for spreading ‘misinformation’. Yet high-profile doctors were allowed to mislead the public with the false claim that these products are ‘SAFE & EFFECTIVE’. The same marketing slogan used for thalidomide in the 1950s, which gave false reassurance to pregnant women and resulted in thousands of stillbirths and babies born with severe limb deformities. Following that scandal, the pharmaceutical industry was prohibited from using the phrase ‘Safe and Effective’. Yet during Covid, government ministers, journalists, media doctors and influencers used the phrase ‘Safe and Effective’ repeatedly, without supporting scientific evidence, to promote and push the novel, gene-based, Covid jabs.

We have identified serious conflicts of interest. Many doctors who promoted Covid jabs received funding from the pharmaceutical industry. The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Authority (MHRA), who approved the jabs and are responsible for safety monitoring, are 86% funded by the industry they are charged with regulating. Meanwhile, the pharmaceutical industry made vast profits while indemnified by the taxpayer for resulting harm or death. Leaving the full risk of Covid vaccine harms (both financial and health) with the unsuspecting public, who were heavily coerced to take products which were neither safe nor necessary.

We call upon you to:
· Investigate serious bias from the GMC and the MPTS,

· Declare a moratorium on censorship within the NHS and uphold freedom of speech

· Ensure effective whistleblower protection is extended to national policy issues

· Exclude anyone with financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry or other conflicts of interest from senior decision-making roles

Yours sincerely

Dr Rosamond Jones, MBBS, DRCOG, MD, FRCPCH, retired Consultant Paediatrician, convenor Children’s Covid Vaccines Advisory Council, email address [email protected]

Dr Clare Craig, BMBCh, FRCPath, Co-Chair, Health Advisory & Recovery Team, https://hartgroup.org

Dr Elizabeth Evans, MA, MBBS, DRCOG, CEO UK Medical Freedom Alliance, https://ukmedfreedom.org

Dr Ayiesha Malik, MBChB, MRCGP(2014), Director, Doctors for Patients UK, https://www.facebook.com/DoctorsForPatientsUK/

Professor Angus Dalgleish, MD, FRCP, FRACP, FRCPath, FMed Sci, Emeritus Professor of Oncology, City St Georges, University of London, Principal, Institute for Cancer Vaccines & Immunotherapy

Professor Richard Ennos, MA, PhD. Honorary Professorial Fellow, University of Edinburgh

Professor John Fairclough FRCS FFSEM retired Honorary Consultant Surgeon

Professor Paul Goddard, MBBS, MD,FRCR,FBIR, retired Professor of Radiology, University of the West of England

Professor David Paton, Professor of Industrial Economics, Nottingham University Business School

Professor David Livermore, BSc, PhD, Professor of Medical Microbiology, University of East Anglia

Professor Roger Watson, FRCP Edin, FRCN, FAAN, Honorary Professor of Nursing, University of Hull

Professor David Seedhouse, Professor of deliberative practice, Aston University

Dr Shiraz Akram, BDS, Dental surgeon

Dr Ancha Bala-Joof, BSc, MBChB, MRCGP, General Practitioner

Dr Andrew Bamji FRCP, retired Consultant Rheumatologist, President British Society for Rheumatology 2006-8

Dr Michael Bazlinton, MBCHB MRCGP DCH

Dr Mark A Bell, MBChB, MRCP(UK), FRCEM, Consultant in Emergency Medicine

Dr Michael D Bell, MBChB, MRCGP, retired General Practitioner

Dr Rajia Bibi, MBBS, General Practitioner

Dr David Bramble, MBChB, MRCPsych, MD, Consultant Psychiatrist

Dr Gillian Breese, BSc, MB ChB, DFFP, DTM&H,retired General Practitioner

Laura Brett, BSc Hons (Midewifery), former NHS midwife

Dr Ian Bridges, MBBS, Retired general practitioner

Dr Rachel Brown, MBChB, LLM, CFMP, MRCPsych

Mr John Bunni, MBChB (Hons), Dip Lap Surg, FRCS [ASGBI Medal], Consultant Colorectal and General Surgeon

Dr Thomas Carnwath, MBBCh,MA, FRCPsych, FRCGP, consultant psychiatrist

Catherine Cassell, RGN, Practice Nurse

Dr Peter Chan, BM, MRCS, MRCGP, NLP, General Practitioner, Functional medicine practitioner

Mr Patrick Chong, MBBS (London) FRCS (Eng) FRCS (Gen Surg), Consultant Vascular Surgeon

James Cook, NHS Registered Nurse, Bachelor of Nursing (Hons), Master of Public Health (MPH)

Dr David Critchley, BSc(hons), PhD, Clinical Pharmacologist (retired)

Dr Christine Dewbury, MBBS, retired General Practitioner

Dr Keith Dewbury, MBBS, FRCR, retired Consultant Radiologist

Dr James Dyson, MRCS LRCP, MA, retired Medical Practitioner

Dr Jonathan Eastwood, BSc, MBChB, MRCGP, retired General Practitioner

Dr Jonathan Engler, MBChB, LlB (Hons), DipPharmMed

Dr Christopher Exley, PhD, FRSB, Bioinorganic Chemist

Dr John Flack, BPharm, PhD, Retired Director of Safety Evaluation, Beecham Pharmaceuticals and Senior Vice-president for Drug Discovery SmithKline Beecham

Dr Nick Flatt, BMSc(Hons), MBChB, FRCSEd, FRCA, FFPMRCA, retired Consultant Anaesthetist

Dr Charles Forsyth, MBBS, BSEM, retired Independent Medical Practitioner

Patricia C G Fraser, retired Principal Teacher

Dr Peter J Fraser, FRIN, Emeritus Senior Lecturer

Dr Sheena Fraser, MBChB, MRCGP (2003), Dip BSLM, General Practitioner

Sophie Gidet, RM, Midwife

Dr Henry Goodall, MBBS, FFOM, retired Consultant Occupational Health Physician, President of the Society of Occupational Medicine, 2011-12

Cheryl Grainger, BSc, Pharma Training Consultant

Dr Cathy Greig, MBBCh(Hons), MRCGP, Functional Medicine Practitioner and past General Practitioner

Dr Catherine Hatton, MBChB, Medical Practitioner, resigned

Alex Hicks, MEng, MCIPS, Compliance Director (Supply Chain)

Dr Matthew Hicks, MBChB, NHS Specialty doctor

Dr Peter Hilton, BSc, MBBS, FRCA, retired Consultant Intensivist/Anaesthetist

Mr Anthony Hinton, MBChB, FRCS, Consultant ENT surgeon, London

Dr Renee Hoenderkampf, MBBS, MRCGP, DFSHRH, General Practitioner

Dr Richard House, PhD, CPsychol, AFBPsS, CertCouns, Chartered Psychologist, former senior lecturer in Psychology (Roehampton) and Early Childhood (Wi******er), retired psychotherapist

Eshani King, BSc (Hons) FCA CTA BFP - Evidence Based Research in Immunology and Health

Dr Tanya Klymenko, PhD, FHEA, FIBMS, Senior lecturer in Biomedical Sciences

Dr Caroline Lapworth, MB ChB, General Practitioner

Dr Branko Latinkic, BSc, PhD, Molecular Biologist

Dr Felicity Lillingstone, IMD DHS PhD ANP, Doctor, Urgent Care, Research Fellow

Dr Geoffrey Maidment, MBBS, DRCOG, MD, FRCP, retired consultant physician

Mr Ahmad K Malik, FRCS(Tr & Orth), Dip Med Sport, Consultant Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgeon, resigned, independent broadcaster.

Dr Kulvinder S Manik, MBChB, MRCGP (2010), MA(Cantab), LLM, Gray’s Inn

Dr Fiona Martindale, MbChB, MRCGP, GP in out of hours

Dr Samuel McBride, MBBCh, BAO, BSc, MSc, MRCP (UK) FRCEM, FRCP (Edinburgh), NHS Emergency Medicine & geriatrics

Kaira McCallum, BSc, retired pharmacist, Director of strategy UKMFA

Mr Ian McDermott, MBBS, MS, FRCS(Tr&Orth), FFSEM(UK), Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon

Dr Janet Menage, MA, MBChB, retired General Practitioner

Dr Alistair J Montgomery, MBChB, MRCGP, DRCOG, retired General Practitioner

Dr Alan Mordue, MBChB, FFPH. Retired Consultant in Public Health Medicine & Epidemiology

Margaret Moss, MA (Cantab), CBiol, MRSB, Director, The Nutrition and Allergy Clinic, Cheshire

Dr Greta Mushet, MBChB, MRCPsych, retired Consultant Psychiatrist in Psychotherapy

Dr Sarah Myhill, MBBS, Retired General Practitioner

Dr Chris Newton, PhD, Biochemist working in immuno-metabolism

Dr Rachel Nicoll, PhD, Medical researcher

Dr Richard J. O’Shea. MBBCh, BA(Hons) MRCGP, General Practitioner

Sue Parker Hall, CTA, MSc (Counselling & Supervision), MBACP, EMDR. Psychotherapist

Dr Christina Peers, MBBS, DRCOG, DFSRH, FFSRH, Naturopathic Holistic Practitioner

Rev Dr William J U Philip, MBChB, MRCP, BD, Senior Minister The Tron Church, Glasgow, formerly physician specialising in cardiology

Dr Gerry Quinn, PhD, Postdoctoral researcher in microbiology and immunology

Dr Tomasz Rajkowski, MD, PhD, MRCPCH, Consultant Paediatrician

Victoria Rixon, Midwife, resigned

Mr Angus Robertson, BSc(Med Sci), MBChB, FRCS(Ed), FFSEM(UK), Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon

Dr Jon Rogers, MBChB(Bristol), MRCGP, DRCOG, Retired NHS General Practitioner

Mr T James Royle, MBChB, FRCS(Ed), MMedEd, Consultant Colorectal Surgeon

Dr Alison Sabine, MBChB, MRCP, Consultant Rheumatologist

Sorrel Scott, Grad Dip Phys, Specialist Physiotherapist in Neurology, 30 years in NHS

Dr Rohaan Seth, BSc(Hons), MBChB(Hons), MRCGP, General Practitioner

Dr Magdalena Stasiak-Horkan MBBS, MRCGP (2017), DCH, General Practitioner

Dr Christine Suppelt MD FRCS MFHom, Ophthalmic Surgeon & Specialist for Integrated Medicine

Dr Jasmine Thomas, MBBCh, NHS doctor

Dr Noel Thomas, MA, MBChB, DObsRCOG, DTM&H, MFHom, Retired Doctor

Dr Livia Tossici-Bolt, PhD, retired Clinical Scientist

Sarah Waters, BA (Hons), Dip Counselling & Therapy, MBACP, Psychotherapist, Therapeutic Parenting Practitioner

Dr Stefanie Williams, MD, Dermatologist

Dr Anne Wynne-Simmons, MBBS, MRCGP, General Practitioner, retired

Our videos are being shared globally. We now have subtitles in Czech. If you know someone that speaks Czech and would li...
16/01/2026

Our videos are being shared globally. We now have subtitles in Czech. If you know someone that speaks Czech and would like them to understand more of the safety of the products generally called covid vaccines, then please do share our videos.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FijXUQrJHLE

We would like to thank the translators for rigorously going through and producing these translations which are available for the first 3 of our talks from our 3rd Health and Truth Conference.

For a decade the United Kingdom has been bombarded each winter with messages urging people to “get the flu jab.” Hospita...
19/12/2025

For a decade the United Kingdom has been bombarded each winter with messages urging people to “get the flu jab.” Hospitals are wallpapered with posters, high‑street chemists run slogans, and the national broadcaster recycles the same reassurance: safe, effective, and vital.
Yet the decades‑long rise in influenza vaccine uptake has reversed across every demographic — including the one group least expected to walk away: doctors, nurses, and front‑line NHS staff.

Read our new article below...

24/11/2025

The NHS plan to have a trial involving giving over 200 children "puberty blockers", some as young as 10 years old. In reality, these are drugs used for chemical castration that cause osteoporosis, sterility and serious, irreversible harm.

The NHS’s own Cass Review (2024) and NICE’s 2021 evidence review both admit there is very low‑quality evidence supporting the use of puberty blockers in children. These drugs are known to cause reduced bone density, infertility, and s*xual dysfunction — harms acknowledged even in industry and government reviews.

We request that you contact your local MP and ask them to sign the petition in parliament, led by Rupert Lowe MP.

This trial is not compassionate medicine — it is state‑sanctioned child abuse disguised as “care.” No civilised society should permit the medical experimentation of children with such profoundly damaging drugs.

Please take action today.

Contact your local MP and demand that they stand up for innocent children by signing Rupert Lowe MP’s parliamentary petition to stop this unethical trial immediately.

Our government must protect children — not sacrifice them on the altar of ideology.

Every voice matters. Every child deserves safety. Let’s end this medical scandal before it begins.

23/11/2025

Did we lockdown too late to stop the virus as the Covid Inquiry is now suggesting?

Why does the BBC article open with “chaotic decision-making” as the key takeaway, but omit quantifiable discussion of health outcomes—care‑home deaths, excess mortality, and Midazolam/morphine usage—that directly determined life and death?

Why are structural failures attributed mainly to “political divisions” instead of asking whether policy conformity to Whitehall and pharmaceutical guidance caused the real harm?

Why does the headline treat administrative confusion as the tragedy rather than avoidable deaths from medical mismanagement?

The inquiry admits that lockdown timing caused unnecessary fatalities—so why are the words “a week earlier, lives would have been saved” allowed to stand without the obvious question: Who ignored the early warnings, and under whose advice?

Did the BBC ask why no consideration of non‑pharmaceutical, community‑based, or outpatient early treatments was recorded in Stormont’s minutes?

Where is the attention to how hospital‑acquired infections, DNR orders, and silenced whistleblowers factored into those deaths?

How many people in Northern Ireland actually died with COVID versus from COVID, and why is that distinction still absent from the BBC article and the COVID inquiry five years on?

If the report claims poor coordination, what were the measurable outcomes of that failure—how many hospital beds, ventilators, delayed surgeries, suicides, or missed cancer diagnoses?

Why does the BBC never quantify harms from lockdown policy itself while exhaustively quoting officials praising the very same restrictions?

Why does the piece devote paragraphs to tensions between Sinn Féin and the DUP but neglect the wider issue of closed‑door SAGE‑style influence—who was actually writing the decision templates these ministers rubber‑stamped?

If the inquiry confirmed a “lack of urgency,” why not ask whether that inertia was deliberate—perhaps to align with Westminster timelines for “one‑nation” messaging?

What lobbying correspondence or pharmaceutical contracts shaped Robin Swann’s decisions, and why is the BBC unwilling to probe that angle?

Who were the “scientific advisers” the report praises, and what conflicts of interest did they hold with pharmaceutical or academic funding streams?

Why does the BBC still treat “following the science” as a neutral phrase when it effectively meant following a narrow, government‑selected consensus?

Where is scrutiny of Baroness Hallett herself—her relationships with policy architects or the civil‑service machine she purports to expose?

The BBC emphasizes political theatre but ignores repeated testimony from families about patients left to die alone, denied antibiotics, or chemically sedated. Why?

Why does the report’s own admission—“a week earlier, people like my mummy would have been saved”—not lead to broader questions about why that delay occurred across all devolved nations simultaneously?

Could it be that the delays were not random failures but manifestations of a synchronized UK‑wide response tested against behavioural‑science models such as SPI‑B?

Has the BBC reviewed its role in shaping public fear that pressured these same politicians into the “too‑late, too‑much” pattern now condemned?

Will the BBC ever include in its self‑analysis the possibility that its own daily briefings amplified panic and silenced dissenting scientists, enabling the very chaos it now reports as news?

After years of lockstep coverage and refusal to platform bereaved families who question Midazolam or care‑home policy, why should the public view current BBC reporting as credible?

If journalism’s job is to comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable, then this BBC piece comforts both: the political class and itself. The real questions aren’t about partisan leaks in Stormont; they’re about how institutional obedience—political, medical, and media—conspired to turn a governance failure into a human catastrophe. Until those questions are asked, every “lessons‑learned” headline remains a euphemism for continued evasion.

In the fog of official opacity that blanketed the pandemic years, one independent investigator quietly did what entire newsrooms refused to do: watch every hour of testimony, archive every deleted clip, and contextualize every bureaucratic admission.

Known only by the handle biologyphenom, this prolific Substack author became the de‑facto record keeper of both the Scottish COVID‑19 Inquiry and the UK Inquiry. His work is exhaustive — hundreds of timestamps, screenshots, transcriptions and comparative analyses connecting seemingly isolated cases into a unified pattern: a systemic architecture of neglect built and maintained by state policy.

While the BBC reported the inquiries as dull procedural exercises, BiologyPhenom captured the lived horror — the tremble in the voice of a daughter describing her mother’s final video call, the resigned tone of care‑home managers admitting they were forbidden to call ambulances.

He did not editorialize; he documented. The evidence, linked below, once seen in totality, speaks for itself.

Fact check: not locking down at all (like Sweden) would have saved lives in the UK. Hard to believe how much money the U...
22/11/2025

Fact check: not locking down at all (like Sweden) would have saved lives in the UK.

Hard to believe how much money the UK has spent on this covid inquiry, the truth will prevail eventually.

Source: Dr. Jay Bhattacharya (director of NIH and founder of the Great Barrington Declaration that called for focused protection, not quarantining the entire country that wasn't sick).

What do the revelations from the COVID inquiry really say? Link to article in the comments.
21/11/2025

What do the revelations from the COVID inquiry really say? Link to article in the comments.

03/11/2025

Heavily vaccinated countries with little prior COVID exposure experienced a surge in deaths after Omicron. New Zealand, Australia, and South Korea saw 400 deaths per million, while Europe, with its first wave, saw fewer. Why this discrepancy?

01/11/2025

In 2020, Margaret Keenan was celebrated as the first vaccine recipient. But a US government report revealed injected vaccines don't provide mucosal immunity against respiratory viruses. Fauci knew this. Then the narrative shifted to "miracle" vaccines stopping community spread—a claim he later retracted.

Address

Belfast
Belfast
BT248XT

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Health and Truth posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Health and Truth:

Share