18/06/2026
A bit of interesting data for those following the LP (a) journey and a few people I know are saying no to statins. For the record I’m a firm believer of your body and your choice. My body is weird so I am invested in learning about it 🤣 how many “what is happening now?” Moments are too much and we had another today
As many of you know, my Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is higher than normal. As Lp(a) is largely genetically determined, it isn’t something that can usually be significantly altered through diet or lifestyle. Whilst my other metabolic markers are in the optimal or good range, I see it as something to be aware of rather than something to worry about.
The report described it as “highly abnormal” which did make me laugh a little. 🤣 It’s higher than the reference range, but context matters, and I prefer to look at the whole picture rather than one number in isolation.
I recently started taking plant sterols to see what effect they may have on my cholesterol markers. On the Prodoc testing platform (which I’m still evaluating and comparing against laboratory testing), my LDL cholesterol reduced by 1.2 mmol/L between 5th June and 17th June. I still don’t see Prodoc as something that the NHS should adopt widely in its current form. Whilst AI has its place and may be useful for identifying trends or prompting further investigation, I don’t currently believe it is efficient enough to replace established methods of assessment and testing. I bet there are lots of false results.
For me, there are too many variables and assumptions involved in algorithm-generated results. I place greater confidence in direct measurements, laboratory testing and clinical judgement than in estimates produced by AI models.
That’s just my personal view based on my own experience of comparing the results with traditional testing. I’m forever testing my body through the amazing things WE have witnessed.
Whilst that’s an interesting change, I’m not particularly focused on LDL alone. My main interest is ApoB, as this provides a better indication of the number of potentially atherogenic particles circulating in the bloodstream. I should add my lipid profile is fine but with LP (a) risk they prefer LDL to be low. Yes, I’ve read the arguments about cholesterol levels through medics, homeopaths and everyone 🤣. I listen to my team from other vibrations and one is a Dr and he’s seen me right all my life … so 😉 they win over everything but I’m intelligent enough to sit and hear 2 sides of arguments.
I’ll be repeating my blood tests through Thriva in around six weeks to see whether these changes are reflected in laboratory testing and to monitor any changes in ApoB and my wider metabolic profile. Thriva test was lower than prodoc so that will be good if it’s shifted like prodoc as I would be at the recommended range 1.6 😉. No matter how tempted I get I’m not repeating the test until it drops on my mat in 6 weeks. A
For now, it’s simply interesting data. Information creates awareness, awareness allows choices, and panic has never improved anybody’s blood results. 🤣
And yes, I once had a doctor ask me how I “scanned” myself. He definitely wasn’t prepared for the answer—but he did ask! 🤣🤣🤣
Those who don’t want to fall on the statin train may be interested.
Watch my journey 🤣
The higher vibrations tell me I work slightly different and they will tell me when I need to be concerned. Always have ❤️🫂🪽🫂After all this time you would think they know how my brain works though🤣
