18/05/2026
Liminal Rhythm Trust supports the current petition calling for “good character” evidence to no longer be considered in sentencing for sexual offending in Aotearoa.
Not because we believe punishment alone creates healing.
But because we believe survivors deserve justice systems that centre harm over reputation.
For too long, many survivors of sexual harm have experienced a devastating contradiction:
the person who harmed them was also the person most likely to be protected by community standing, professional status, social influence, or public likability.
Many sexual offenders are not hidden from society.
They are often trusted by society.
Respected.
Successful.
Educated.
Liked.
Embedded within families, workplaces, leadership, faith communities, and institutions.
And this matters.
Because one of the deepest wounds many survivors carry is not only the abuse itself —
but the experience of watching systems struggle to reconcile harm with respectability.
When survivors sit in court and hear extensive testimony about an offender’s “good character,” contribution to society, career success, or community reputation, many do not experience that as balanced justice.
They experience it as a continuation of the same conditions that allowed abuse to remain unseen, minimised, excused, or disbelieved in the first place.
At Liminal Rhythm Trust, we work specifically alongside wāhine navigating life after sexual harm.
We see the long-term impacts of trauma every day:
the nervous system injuries,
the loss of safety,
the impact on parenting,
relationships,
identity,
health,
economic stability,
and the exhausting labour of rebuilding a life after violation.
We also see how profoundly survivors are affected when systems appear to place greater weight on the future, reputation, or social value of the offender than on the lifelong impact carried by those harmed.
This is not about denying complexity or humanity.
It is about recognising that social respectability is not evidence of safety.
And it is about acknowledging that “good character” considerations can disproportionately advantage those who already hold social power, credibility, education, wealth, or influence.
Survivors should not have to compete against reputation in order for harm to be fully recognised.
We do not believe this proposed change alone will repair the deep systemic failures survivors continue to face across justice, health, mental health, and social systems.
But we do believe systems communicate values.
And for too long, many survivors have received the message that public image can soften the gravity of sexual harm.
We believe that needs to change.
At its core, this conversation is about whose reality systems are designed to centre.
Liminal Rhythm Trust stands firmly alongside survivors in calling for systems that prioritise accountability, dignity, safety, and survivor voice over social standing and offender image.
fans
Petitions are addressed to the House of Representatives and ask that the House do something about a policy or law, or put right a local or private concern.