Usmania Pathology Lab Kohat

22/05/2026

Henceforth, we shall be credentialed and institutionally recognized as Clinical & Biomedical Scientists upon the AHPC regulatory portal, a nomenclature exponentially more distinguished than the rudimentary classifications of “Technician” or “Technologist.”

Our professional domain encompasses scientific oversight, diagnostic governance, and supervisory authority over technical cadres within the healthcare laboratory infrastructure. We are not mere operators of instrumentation; we are Clinical Scientists custodians of translational diagnostics and biomedical intellect.

Remain interconnected, vigilant, and cautiously optimistic regarding forthcoming developments.

And for the self-proclaimed “Genzeeeeeez,” kindly deposit a symbolic 👎 within the comment section.

Despite relentless endeavors by certain factions to extricate Microbiologists, Biochemists, and Biotechnologists from the healthcare continuum, the Higher Education Commission (HEC) has effectively repudiated such exclusionary ambitions and delivered AHPC a metaphorical 👎 of institutional resistance....

Muhammad Umer
Clinical & Biomedical Scientist
Owner of
1) Al Haider Pathology Lab And Research Center Kohat...
2) Usmania Pathology Lab Kohat...

03/05/2026

01/03/2026

ہمارے لیبارٹری نیٹ ورک میں تمام ٹیومر تشخیصی مارکرز دستیاب ہیں:
1) عثمانیہ پیتھالوجی لیبارٹری، کوہاٹ... نزد پولیس لائن ہنگو روڈ ۔۔۔
03169913710
2) حیدری ڈائیگناسٹک لیبارٹری، کوہاٹ...
المنصور پلازہ کے ڈی اے گیٹ نمبر 02 ...
03134574340...
نیز غریب اور مستحق مریضوں اور علمائے کرام کے لیے 50 فیصد خصوصی رعایت بھی فراہم کی جاتی ہے...

18/02/2026

Respected & Dear KPHCC...
Ihtiraamat...

if Category-A licensing truly depends on four fixed designations (1) RMP, 2) Subject Specialist, 3) Director, 4) Shift/Section Head), and missing even one disqualifies the lab, then the system itself needs serious re-evaluation...

Because logically and technically
If a person already holds BS + M.Phil + PhD in any of the domain of Laboratory Sciences, that individual is:

*Formally trained in core clinical laboratory disciplines...

*Academically specialized in diagnostics...

*Practically experienced in testing and interpretation...

*Scientifically qualified to supervise quality systems, validation, calibration, and reporting...

Then why should such a professional still be forced to depend on an RMP or Pathologist title?

This makes no professional sense...

A laboratory scientist with advanced degrees:
Studies lab sciences from basic to advanced level...
1) Performs testing hands-on...
2) Understands methodology...
3) QC, IQC/EQA, SOPs, biosafety, and accreditation standards
Whereas:

An RMP or Pathologist usually studies medicine, not laboratory sciences in that depth...

They only touch one domain of diagnostics/pathology, yet automatically become Director on paper while the actual lab specialist, who runs everything practically, is sidelined...
That is fundamentally unfair...

This creates a system where:
** The person who studied labs is ignored...
** The person who did not specialize in labs becomes Director...
** The real technical expert remains dependent...

I think this is Professional injustice to Clinical Laboratory Specialists.

If someone is academically qualified up to PhD in Laboratory Sciences, they should be independently eligible to:

**** Direct a Diagnostic lab
**** Supervise sections
**** Fulfill Category-A requirements without needing an RMP or Pathologist as a formal stamp authority....

Otherwise, it discourages higher education in laboratory sciences and reduces PhD/MPhil holders to mere technical staff despite being the backbone of diagnostics...

A modern healthcare system must recognize domain expertise, not just medical titles.
Clinical laboratories should be led by laboratory specialists, not administratively assigned physicians. This will be logical, Ethical & Technical Decision...