20/08/2026
Marco Rubio’s message is striking:
“If there were more countries like Israel, the world would be a safer and better place.”
Rubio is making a sweeping argument about Israel’s role in global security and suggesting that other nations could learn from its approach. But a statement this strong also raises a bigger question: what exactly does “more countries like Israel” mean—and who gets to decide what makes a country safer or better?
Supporters may see the comment as recognition of Israel’s military strength, intelligence capabilities, democratic institutions, and close partnership with the United States.
Critics, however, may argue that security cannot be measured by military power alone and that any discussion of Israel must also consider the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, civilian suffering, human rights, and regional tensions.
Either way, Rubio’s statement is bound to fuel debate over what America considers a model for global security and stability.