09/01/2026
BECOMING
The Psychology of Who We Were, Who We Are, and Who We Become
PART I — THE BASELINE SELF
How the Child We Were Continues to Live Inside the Adult We Became
By Kenneth Fuller
There comes a point in life when looking backward becomes more than remembering.
We begin investigating.
We begin asking questions that perhaps we were not emotionally or intellectually equipped to ask when we were younger:
Why did I become the person I became?
Why do I respond to certain situations the way I do? Why do certain people trigger emotions in me that seem larger than the moment itself? Why do I repeat behaviors I thought I had already outgrown?
And perhaps the most difficult question:
Why did I make some of the choices I made?
As we grow older, we may find ourselves lying awake at night revisiting decisions, relationships, mistakes, missed opportunities, and moments we wish we could change.
But there is a problem with judging our younger selves entirely through the consciousness of the person we are today.
The child we were did not possess the knowledge of the adult we became.
That child was learning.
And what that child learned became part of the foundation upon which the adult was eventually built.
⸻
What I Call the Baseline Self
I have come to think about this as the Baseline Self.
“Baseline personality” is not a formal psychological diagnosis or a single established scientific construct. I use the term as a way of bringing several established areas of psychological science together: temperament, personality development, attachment, identity formation, emotional regulation, learned behavior, and the stories we construct about our lives.
Psychological research tells us that personality begins developing early, but it is not frozen in childhood. Temperament provides an important foundation, while personality continues to develop through adolescence and adulthood. Identity develops alongside it as we form increasingly sophisticated ideas about who we are, what we value, where we belong, and who we believe we can become.
That distinction is important.
Our childhood may establish a baseline.
It does not necessarily establish our destination.
Our baseline is the starting configuration from which we continue developing.
It includes what we were born with.
It includes what we experienced.
It includes what we witnessed.
It includes what we were taught.
And perhaps most importantly, it includes what we concluded about life before we were old enough to understand that we were forming conclusions.
The child watches.
The child absorbs.
The child imitates.
The child adapts.
And eventually, what began as adaptation can feel like identity.
We may eventually say:
“This is just who I am.”
But sometimes what we call personality is partly the accumulated history of what we learned to do in order to belong, survive, be loved, be accepted, protect ourselves, or make sense of the world.
⸻
The Two Worlds Within Me
My own childhood provides an interesting example.
I was raised in the church.
My spiritual awareness began very early. At approximately six years old, during communion, I experienced what I understood to be my first conversion experience.
That experience mattered.
The church gave me language for God, morality, responsibility, spirituality, community, right and wrong, and the possibility of becoming something greater than myself.
But that was not the only world in which I was being raised.
I also lived over a bar.
I danced in cafés.
I was exposed to another adult world—nightlife, sexuality, alcohol, prostitutes, pimps, music, performance, human survival, and the realities of people living outside the boundaries of the religious environment in which I was being formed.
These experiences are part of the public history documented in my memoirs.
What interests me now is not simply the contrast between those environments.
It is what happens psychologically when both worlds become part of the same child.
A six-year-old does not necessarily possess the developmental capacity to construct a sophisticated psychological map and say:
This belongs to my spiritual identity.
That belongs to the world I should reject.
The child experiences life first.
Meaning comes later.
And life becomes the curriculum.
I learned about the sacred.
I learned about the sensual.
I learned about morality.
I learned about survival.
I learned about performance.
I learned about human weakness.
I learned about compassion.
I learned about contradiction.
And all of those lessons became part of me.
Some became gifts.
Some became burdens.
Some became behaviors I would eventually have to examine.
⸻
The Psychology of Contradiction
Developmental psychology does not suggest that early experience mechanically determines adult behavior.
Early experience matters.
But it does not determine our destiny.
Research on attachment, for example, finds meaningful associations between early relationships and later patterns of relating, while also demonstrating that attachment remains influenced by later experiences and relationships. Personality likewise demonstrates both continuity and change across the life course.
That distinction gives me room to breathe.
Because if childhood completely determined adulthood, there would be very little room for growth.
But there is.
Our history may explain us without imprisoning us.
That means I can look at my younger self and ask:
What did he learn?
What did he adapt to?
What did he misunderstand?
What did he get right?
What did he carry forward that no longer belongs in his life?
⸻
When Adaptation Becomes Identity
Many behaviors that emerge in childhood make sense within the environment in which they developed.
A highly sensitive child may become extraordinarily perceptive.
A child who learns to read the room may become exceptionally good at reading people.
A child who must become independent may become resilient.
A child who learns to perform may become creative.
A child who learns to protect himself may become strong.
But every adaptation has a possible shadow.
Perceptiveness can become hypervigilance.
Independence can become isolation.
Sensitivity can become emotional overwhelm.
Performance can become a need for validation.
Self-protection can become difficulty trusting.
And survival skills can remain active long after the circumstances that required them have disappeared.
This may be one of the great psychological challenges of adulthood:
The thing that once protected us can eventually become the thing that limits us.
⸻
Good and Bad Can Come From the Same Place
I no longer believe that our baseline is simply good or bad.
It contains possibilities.
The same childhood can produce courage and fear.
The same experience can produce wisdom and resentment.
The same environment can produce compassion and defensiveness.
The same person can carry both.
That means personal growth is not necessarily about destroying the person we once were.
It may be about integrating him.
There is a difference between:
“I understand why I did that.”
and:
“Therefore, what I did was right.”
There is also a difference between:
“I regret that choice.”
and:
“I am a bad person because I made that choice.”
Understanding is not excusing.
Accountability is not self-hatred.
And regret does not have to become a life sentence.
⸻
Interviewing the Younger Self
Perhaps instead of putting our younger selves on trial, we should interview them.
Ask:
What were you trying to accomplish?
What were you afraid of?
What did you believe love was?
What did you believe you had to do to be accepted?
What did you learn about being a man?
What did you learn about power?
What did you learn about sexuality?
What did you learn about spirituality?
What did you learn from the adults around you?
What were you trying to survive?
And perhaps the most important question:
What did you not yet know?
That question can create compassion without removing responsibility.
⸻
We Become the Authors of Our Own Story
There is another dimension of personality development that becomes especially meaningful as we age: narrative identity.
Psychologist Dan McAdams and other personality researchers have explored how people develop a life story that gives meaning and continuity to their experiences.
We do not simply possess traits.
We also construct stories about ourselves.
Who am I?
Where did I come from?
What happened to me?
What did those experiences mean?
Who am I becoming?
This matters because there is a difference between what happened to us and the story we eventually tell ourselves about what happened to us.
And sometimes aging gives us the opportunity to change the interpretation without changing the history.
The facts may remain.
The meaning can change.
⸻
The Emotional Cost of an Unexamined Baseline
Perhaps some of our suffering comes from living according to an internal program we have never consciously examined.
We react before we reflect.
We defend before we understand.
We withdraw before we communicate.
We pursue before we ask whether we actually want what we are pursuing.
We repeat before we recognize the pattern.
And then we wonder why we keep arriving at the same emotional destination.
This is where emotional regulation becomes more than simply “controlling our emotions.”
Emotion is information.
Anger may tell us that something matters.
Grief may tell us that something mattered.
Fear may tell us that we perceive danger.
Regret may tell us that our present values are different from our past behavior.
The goal is not to eliminate emotion.
The goal is to become capable of experiencing emotion without automatically becoming governed by it.
The mature question becomes:
What am I feeling?
Then:
Why am I feeling it?
Then:
What do I want to do with it?
And finally:
Does this emotion belong entirely to this moment, or is this moment touching something much older?
That question can change a life.
⸻
Aging Changes the Conversation
As we grow older, perspective begins to change.
We can finally see patterns.
We can connect events that once seemed unrelated.
We can recognize how childhood experiences influenced adult relationships, ambitions, fears, choices, and expectations.
And sometimes that awareness arrives with grief.
We may mourn the person we might have become under different circumstances.
We may mourn people we hurt.
We may mourn people who hurt us.
We may mourn opportunities that passed.
We may even mourn versions of ourselves that no longer exist.
But aging can also provide an extraordinary opportunity:
integration.
Instead of asking:
“How do I erase the person I used to be?”
we can ask:
“What can I learn from him?”
⸻
Who Am I Now?
Perhaps this is ultimately the question of maturity:
Who am I now?
Not:
Who was I supposed to be?
Not:
Who did my environment teach me to be?
Not:
Who did my mistakes convince me I was?
But:
Who am I now, with everything I know?
I can acknowledge the church that shaped my spiritual consciousness.
I can acknowledge the bars, cafés, streets, people, and environments that shaped other parts of my understanding.
I can acknowledge the contradictions.
I can acknowledge the mistakes.
I can acknowledge the gifts.
I can acknowledge the wounds.
And I can decide what continues forward.
⸻
Integration Instead of Erasure
Perhaps healing is not becoming someone entirely different.
Perhaps healing is becoming more conscious of who we already are.
We carry inheritance.
We carry temperament.
We carry adaptation.
We carry memory.
We carry culture.
We carry spirituality.
We carry wounds.
We carry gifts.
But we also carry something extraordinarily powerful:
choice.
The older we become, the more responsibility we have to distinguish between what belongs to our history and what belongs to our future.
Some things deserve to be preserved.
Some deserve to be forgiven.
Some deserve to be released.
And some deserve to be transformed.
So when I lie awake at night thinking about the choices I made—right, wrong, beautiful, painful, wise, foolish—I am learning not to ask only:
“What was wrong with me?”
I am learning to ask:
“What was happening inside me?”
And then:
“What do I want to happen inside me now?”
That is a very different question.
It moves us from judgment toward understanding.
From shame toward accountability.
From fragmentation toward integration.
And perhaps, ultimately, from simply surviving our history to consciously becoming the authors of what comes next.
The Baseline Self is where we began.
It does not have to be where we end.
⸻
Professional References
American Psychological Association. APA Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology: Personality Processes and Individual Differences. Research addressing temperament, personality development, and individual differences across development.
Shiner, R. L., Soto, C. J., & De Fruyt, F. “Personality Assessment of Children and Adolescents.” Annual Review of Developmental Psychology. Research examining personality development and assessment during childhood and adolescence.
Klimstra, T. A. “Adolescent Personality Development and Identity Formation.” Child Development Perspectives. Research concerning the relationship between personality development and identity formation during adolescence.
McAdams, D. P. Research on personality development and narrative identity across the life course, including the development of personal life stories as a mechanism for creating continuity and meaning.
Fraley, R. C. Research on attachment in adulthood, including the continuity and change of attachment patterns across the life course.
Fraley, R. C., & Roisman, G. I. “The Development of Adult Attachment Styles: Four Lessons.” Current Opinion in Psychology. Research examining the development and malleability of attachment patterns.
Gross, J. J. Research on emotion regulation, including the ways individuals influence the emotions they experience, when they experience them, and how those emotions are expressed.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Resources concerning child development and the interaction of developmental experiences, relationships, and health across the life course.