Karmic Care

02/04/2026

01/04/2026

Some days, my own health and disabilities make even the simplest things feel heavy.

There are mornings where getting out of bed takes everything I have. Days where pain, fatigue, or the weight of managing complex health tries to slow me down. Living this reality isn’t something I can switch off — it’s part of my everyday life.

But still, I get up.

Not because it’s easy. Not because I have endless energy. But because I know what it feels like to need support and not always receive it in the way you deserve.

That’s what drives me.

Karmic Care was built from these lived moments — from the hard days, the resilience, and the deep understanding of how much genuine support matters. I don’t just work in this space… I live it.

And even on my toughest days, I choose to show up for others. To listen. To advocate. To make things just a little bit easier for someone else walking a similar path.

Because creating change and making a positive impact isn’t just something I do — it’s who I am.

This is not just a business.
This is lived experience turned into purpose.
This is Karmic Care.

29/03/2026

A reminder for those working in this space: not every person accessing support is automatically kind, vulnerable, or easy to work with.

NDIS participants are people — and like anywhere else, that includes a full spectrum of personalities and behaviours. Some can be difficult, some can be disrespectful, and in rare cases, even abusive or engaging in harmful actions.

And sometimes, even after you’ve genuinely tried to help, those same individuals may attempt to damage your reputation — sharing one-sided stories, selective messages, or framing your responses to their threats or abuse as wrongdoing on your part.

These situations are real, and they impact providers more than people realise.

Supporting people doesn’t mean ignoring reality. It means setting boundaries, maintaining professionalism, and ensuring safety for everyone involved.

Respect should go both ways — and as a community, we need to stand together and support providers who are being unfairly targeted. Silence only allows this behaviour to continue.

17/03/2026

I’ve recently become aware of rumours being circulated by a small number of disgruntled providers. Let me be clear — I stand firmly in my integrity, my work, and the role I carry as a support coordinator.

This role isn’t always comfortable. It requires calling out poor practices, advocating for vulnerable participants, and ensuring providers are meeting the standards expected of them. Not everyone will welcome that — and that’s okay.

I know the truth, I stand in the truth, and I am not afraid of it.

People who operate with honesty and accountability don’t fear scrutiny. But when standards are challenged, negativity can sometimes follow. That does not change my responsibility — and it certainly won’t change how I show up.

I will always advocate for participants. I will always do my job properly. And I will always act in the best interests of those I support.

If anyone has concerns about me, I encourage reflection first. Accountability starts with looking at our own actions.

I welcome transparency. I welcome accountability. And I will continue to stand strong in the work I do.

12/03/2026

17/02/2026

My Story. My Truth. Let’s Set It Straight.

I’ve seen my name mentioned, hinted at, and even directly accused in posts that don’t tell the full story. Some even AI-written — ironic, really.

Instead of responding with hate, I’m choosing truth.

As a Support Coordinator, my role is to safeguard participants, question wrongdoing, and report concerns when necessary. That’s not personal — that’s the job description.

When providers are called out, not everyone responds with accountability. Some respond with retaliation, hate and lies.

So here are the facts — with some names changed out of respect.

And after each one, I’ll genuinely ask you:

What exactly did I do wrong?

⸻

Story 1 – Client “Newton” & Provider “ARCOFYRE”

Newton was on Home Detention under Corrections. Strict conditions. Limited housing options. Many providers refused him due to perceived “risk.” ARCOFYRE agreed to house him — the owner himself had a history of incarceration and said he understood people in that position.
Supports began.
Within 14 days, I received urgent calls: the property Newton was living in was being evicted by Police and Housing SA.

The owner (Kirby) asked me to assist by writing letters about Newton’s vulnerability. However, when I contacted Housing SA, I was informed the eviction was due to unpaid rent and the property being ceased and they advised me not to get involved, no matter i still wrote a letter on N situation and approval of staying with provider.

Newton was moved to another property owned by the same provider.
Days later — another message: that property was also being evicted.
Two houses. Less than a month.

Corrections, in agreement with Newton’s mother, instructed that he return home immediately for compliance and safety. As I lived close, I was asked to collect him. Client himself text me asking me come get him that night.

I informed the provider professionally. Instead of understanding, I received hostility, blame, and aggression.

I then reported safeguarding concerns to the NDIS, as I am required to do.
Now I’m the villain in this provider’s version of events.

So I ask you:

If a client is evicted twice in under a month and Corrections instruct relocation — is it wrong to act?
Or would it be wrong if I didn’t?

Evictions in Australia aren’t casual misunderstandings. Let’s talk truth, not narratives.

⸻

Story 2 – Provider “Mrs Moggle”

Mrs Moggle was also involved in Newton’s supports.

Instead of transparency, there was manipulation and behind-the-scenes chaos. She distanced herself publicly while contributing privately to the situation. Moggle has a known reputation of coercion and bullying clients into choices she makes, word circles.
When accountability approached, suddenly fingers pointed elsewhere — mainly at me.

I won’t give this story more oxygen than needed.

But I’ll ask:

Is stirring the pot support… or is that just strategy to deflect accountability on causing drama?

⸻

Story 3 – Provider “E”

This provider supported two NDIS participants in a SIL.
Concerns raised:
• Clients not consistently receiving food
• Staff disengaged, sitting in bedrooms watching videos
• Overcharging of services, personal care negligence etc.

I addressed concerns directly.
Instead of resolving them, the response was to attempt to remove me as Support Coordinator.
Luckily, I had evidence. The participants were shown what was happening. They were removed from the SDA & SIL arrangement that was working together against their best interests.
I reported. I safeguarded.

So again:

Is it wrong to call out neglect and overcharging?
Or is it wrong to ignore it?

⸻

Story 4 – Provider “I”

This provider presents well — caring, attentive, supportive from a distance two con artists working for an immature man in the shadows, (The Purple OompaLoompa and Troll)
However, invoices did not align with services delivered. I raised concerns respectfully and clearly. I advised that if discrepancies continued, alternative providers may need to be explored.
Instead of correcting the issues, they:
• Lied to the participant and nominee
• Coerced and influenced them
• Attempted to replace me with their own Support Coordinator (who is also a BDM)
They blocked my communication with the client and told him he had no say.

So let’s ask honestly:

When asking for financial transparency results in being removed — what does that say?

What did I do wrong here? Raise concerns? Protect funding?

⸻

Story 5 – Provider “Len”

Multiple clients. Overcharging far beyond NDIS scope. Funding drained rapidly. No documentation provided.
Clients were manipulated — buying them items using NDIS funds while claiming excessive supports. Some clients saw through it. Some didn’t.

I reported.

Following multiple complaints — not just mine — this provider was banned by the NDIS for life.

Yet somehow, I am blamed.

If there was nothing wrong — why was he permanently banned?

Why did numerous complaints exist?

I still hear that he continues to try to tarnish my name.

But accountability doesn’t equal victimhood.

⸻

Story 6 – Client “C” & Provider “N”

This provider supported a psychosocial participant.
Massive fraudulent claims were identified — up to 13 hours per day charged when the participant was not funded for that level, nor receiving that level of support.
On days rostered for 4–5 hours, they charged 10–13 hours.
The participant repeatedly stated she did not want that many workers or hours.

The previous SC raised concerns and was removed.
I took over the case — already under NDIS Commission review.
I reviewed invoices. I spoke to the participant. I questioned the provider.

The response?

Attempt to remove me —
They had even blocked the previous SC’s number from the participant’s phone and tried to do same to me.

When the participant’s father was informed, he instructed the provider to cease.
The provider (Sanju) then claimed they felt “threatened and abused.”texting this to be me and the father who stood up to them.

I reported further. The Commission thanked me for safeguarding.
Now I am slandered publicly.
So I ask:

Is exposing fraudulent claims abuse?
Or is being questioned uncomfortable?

⸻

So Let’s Be Real

You can read these stories and decide for yourself.

Did I act maliciously?
Or did I act within my role?

Support Coordination is not about popularity. It’s about protection.

If standing tall and reporting wrongdoing means I’m disliked in certain circles — I can live with that.

⸻

Who I Am Outside of This

I’m a mother.
I run free su***de prevention guidance sessions.
I fundraise through my mediumship business.
I adore animals. I love travel. I’m timid at first — until the Scottish strength kicks in and the laughter comes out.

My biggest flaw? I care too much.

So before judging me based on disgruntled voices — get to know me.

My inbox is open. I welcome respectful discussion. I can take criticism when it’s fair.

But if someone paints me as a villain because they were held accountable?

That says more about them than it ever will about me.