02/09/2026
OCD math is less concerned with accuracy and more concerned with reaching one very specific conclusion: “We need to do something about this”…
Check again.
Ask someone.
Review the memory.
Google the symptom.
Avoid the situation.
Run through the evidence one more time, but this time properly.
The problem is that compulsions quietly interfere with the data, which means that the “evidence” is not accurate. For example:
If nothing bad happens after checking, OCD credits the checking.
If nothing bad happens without checking, OCD calls it luck.
If anxiety decreases, the compulsion was apparently necessary.
If anxiety doesn’t decrease, we clearly haven’t done enough of it yet.
Now you have a beautifully balanced accounting system in which OCD can never record a loss. This is part of what makes response prevention in ERP (exposure and response prevention) so difficult. You’re not only resisting the urge to perform a compulsion. You’re allowing OCD’s calculations to remain unresolved.
ERP doesn’t give OCD a better equation. It asks whether you’re willing to stop doing the maths.