12/07/2026
We will be talking more specifically about media coverage framing the autistic students guidelines another day, but this post was triggered by the headline we posted a couple of days ago.
It’s something I have been thinking about and frustrated about for a while now.
So often, especially in media, rights are depicted as “either/or” - as in, one group has rights at the expense of the rights of another. We’ve all seen it - students with disability are framed as being at the expense of teachers workload and wellbeing, teacher workplace bargaining around workload is shown as being detrimental to the rights of students with disability to support and accommodations.
It’s an easy angle to take and it’s one that appeals to populist framings. It’s clickbait, and catchy, and it gets attention.
But here’s the thing- that’s not how rights work.
I wonder if one of the biggest mistakes we make is treating teachers’ rights and students’ rights as though they’re competing with each other.
As though one has to lose for the other to win.
That isn’t actually how human rights work. One of the core principles of human rights is that they’re universal, indivisible, interdependent and interrelated.
Fancy words, but a pretty simple idea.Everyone has human rights. And our rights are connected.
If teachers are expected to do impossible jobs without enough support, that’s a human rights issue.
If disabled students can’t access their education because they aren’t getting the accommodations support and adjustments they need, that’s a human rights issue too.
If the rest of the class misses out because schools are under-resourced, that’s also a human rights issue.
I don’t see those things as competing. I see them as symptoms of the same problem.Maybe we’re asking the wrong question.
Instead of asking, “What about teachers?” or “What about disabled students?” what if we asked why we’re still building education systems that make it feel like we have to choose?
Because I don’t think we should have to.
Teachers deserve safe, sustainable workplaces.
Students deserve an inclusive education.
Both of those things can be true at the same time.
In fact, I’d argue they depend on each other.
- When teachers are supported, students do better.
- When students are supported, teachers are better able to teach.
- When their disabled peers and teachers are supported, students without disability also become better off
That’s what people mean when they say human rights are interdependent. One group’s rights help make everyone else’s rights possible.
So maybe human rights in education were never about teachers’ rights or students’ rights or disabled students rights or their non-disabled peers rights… maybe rather we need to ask -
“why are no ones rights being realised”?
*** visual created by AI based on my words here ***