29/05/2026
Support Coordination win of the week?
Not much to report this week honestly.
Apparently learning that simply speaking in a meeting can sometimes get you labelled as “advocating” 😂
Which raises an interesting question…
Where actually IS the line?
Because good Support Coordinators regularly refer participants to formal advocacy organisations when needed. That’s normal practice.
But in meetings, are we expected to:
identify barriers
explain systems
raise risks
clarify misunderstandings
ask questions
challenge incorrect information
support participant choice and control
…while also somehow remaining completely silent?
Genuine question.
To be clear:I absolutely understand there is a difference between formal advocacy and the role of a Support Coordinator.
If a participant needs systemic representation, legal escalation or independent advocacy, that’s where advocacy organisations come in and referrals should happen.
But if an SC can’t respectfully question processes, seek clarification or ensure participant concerns are understood in a meeting… then what exactly are we doing there besides taking notes?
And no — before anyone imagines chaos — I wasn’t in there behaving like Cujo frothing . . . .
I was calm, professional and acting with participant consent and in their best interests.
Sometimes systems are very comfortable with “coordination” right up until coordination involves confidence, pattern recognition and difficult questions.
Curious whether other SCs have experienced this tension too???
Neens 👋🏻