30/05/2026
Raised eyebrow post š
Qualifications & Is science a fixed truth or is it a process ??
This is my own personal opinion, experience & observations over many years.
A long list of letters after a name means someone followed a curriculum, turned up on time, sat through lectures, revised, passed exams, and got a certificate. It tells you they completed a system of education.
It doesnāt automatically tell you how well they apply it in the real world.
It does NOT automatically mean they are good at their job.
There are highly qualified practitioners still using outdated practices.
And there are qualified but skilled practitioners with no letters after their name who get results.
Many still follow traditions and habits in the horse world that have never really been questioned just repeated so they become the norm.
Great for owners who like to be told what they want to hear.
Not so great for owners who are open minded.
Training gives the foundation but real progress comes from staying open, questioning, and evolving rather than staying fixed in one way of thinking.
Which leads me onto ..
Is science simply the best explanation available based on the evidence at that moment in time.?
As methods improve and new data emerges, conclusions can change.
But the science isnāt updated.
A lot of commonly referenced papers were done many years ago. Methods, understanding, and standards have moved on since then.
When we read a study, we shouldnt just read the title. We should be looking deeper into the papers. Read everything. Scrutinise every word.
Because words matter. They are important in any documentation. Words like ā¦
May.
Suggest.
Could indicate.
Is associated with.
All mean ⦠itās not proven or certain, only a possible link or observation, not a confirmed fact.
Also ..
When was the research actually conducted and submitted?
Who funded it, and who benefits from the outcome?
How many horses were involved 6, 20, or 200?
What were their ages, genders, workloads, and existing conditions?
Under what conditions was the study carried out?
Was the study randomised?
Was it blinded?
Were the results statistically strong, or just suggestive?
Do the conclusions actually match the data presented?
Is a published paper the final word ?
Experience matters.
Science matters.
But neither should be followed blindly.
Itās good to read whatās being claimed.
But take more notice of what they actually proved.
Do your own research.
Ask questions.
Donāt be a follower.
Think for yourself.
Trust your instinct.
Your horse is your teacher especially if you observe & be quiet.
Be your horses advocate.