Beth Forrest Osteopathy

Call Directions Website Contact the business

Beth Forrest Osteopathy Osteopathy for the whole family- I currently have patients from just a few days old to 91 years!

31/07/2026

Hypermobility doesn’t stop at your joints. It can affect your breastfeeding experience, too.

When people think about hypermobility, they often picture knees that bend backward, flexible fingers, or joints that seem to move beyond a typical range.

But connective tissue is found throughout the entire body!!! Including the breasts, ni***es, skin, ligaments, fascia, and blood vessels that connect them to the body!!!!!!

That means the same collagen differences that contribute to generalized joint hypermobility can also influence how breastfeeding and pumping feel.

As an IBCLC and speech-language pathologist, I think this is one of the most under-recognized reasons some parents struggle with nursing or pumping. Too often they’re told, “Your latch looks fine,” or “You’ll just get used to it,” when the reality is that their connective tissue may be responding differently.

Here’s what I commonly see.

Elastic ni***es can change the pumping experience. Not every person with hypermobility has elastic ni***es, and not every elastic ni**le is caused by hypermobility. But there is significant overlap. An elastic ni**le stretches much more readily when suction is applied. During pumping, the ni**le may be pulled much farther into the fl**ge tunnel than expected. Sometimes the ar**la is drawn deeply into the fl**ge as well.

For some mothers, this causes:
• Pain or burning
• Friction against the sides of the tunnel
• Swelling during the pumping session
• Reduced comfort despite trying multiple fl**ge sizes
• Milk removal that feels less efficient than expected

Many moms assume they need a larger fl**ge because more tissue is entering the tunnel. Often, that’s exactly the opposite of what is needed.

We need to support the ni**le while minimizing unnecessary pulling and avoid pulling stretchy ar**la tissue into the fl**ge tunnel. The correct fl**ge size and shape can make a tremendous difference in both comfort and milk removal.

Sometimes fl**ge inserts, softer silicone fl**ges, or fl**ges with a different tunnel design are more comfortable than simply sizing up. I tend to find smaller, hard plastic fl**ges in a shape better fit for each breast shape work better than silicone for hypermobility. We need stability before mobility.

Breastfeeding can present its own challenges. A baby removes milk very differently than a pump. They use suction, but they also rhythmically compress the breast with their tongue and jaw.

For someone with more elastic connective tissue, however, the ni**le may stretch farther into the baby’s mouth during a feeding. While ni**le stretching is a normal part of breastfeeding, excessive stretching can contribute to discomfort for some.

Sometimes mothers describe the sensation as:
• Pulling
• Burning
• Deep aching
• Tissue fatigue after feeds

The latch may actually be excellent (or baby may also have hypermobility or other issues like tongue tie!!!! I see that more and more in families!!!)

The discomfort may be because highly elastic tissue is responding differently to the normal forces of breastfeeding.

Positioning matters more than many people realize. Hypermobility often means the muscles have to work harder to stabilize joints because the ligaments provide less passive support. Now imagine holding a growing baby for 20–40 minutes, eight or more times each day.

Shoulders elevate.
Wrists bend.
Thumbs support breast tissue.
The neck flexes.
The lower back rounds.
Hips rotate.

Even a position that looks comfortable can become exhausting. Many hypermobile mothers tell me they feel completely drained after feeds because their muscles have been doing so much work just to maintain the position.

This is where support becomes essential. Don’t think of pillows and furniture as a convenience. Think of them as part of your treatment plan. Supporting your elbows, forearms, wrists, lower back, and the baby’s weight can significantly reduce muscle fatigue over the course of a day.

Sometimes one extra pillow makes all the difference. Sometimes feeding in bed or in side lying promote longevity.

Sensory experiences matter, too. Many people with hypermobility also experience sensory processing differences, dysautonomia, or conditions such as POTS or hEDS. While these don’t occur together in everyone, they are common enough that they deserve consideration.

The sound of a pump.
The vibration.
The repetitive suction.
The feeling of tissue stretching.

These sensations can become overwhelming, even if the pump is technically “working.” This is why choosing a breast pump shouldn’t be based on suction strength alone, or what’s popular on social media or with other moms

Questions I often ask include:
• Does the vibration feel soothing or irritating?
• Does the suction feel smooth or sharp?
• Can you comfortably trigger multiple letdowns?
• Does the pump leave your ni***es feeling bruised or swollen afterward?

The “best” pump is the one that removes milk effectively while respecting your body’s unique sensory and connective tissue needs.

There is no one-size-fits-all approach.

One of my biggest hopes for lactation care is that we stop assuming every body responds the same way.

Connective tissue differences matter. Joint stability matters. Sensory experiences matter. Comfort matters.

And when we recognize those differences instead of dismissing them, we can help parents find solutions that actually fit their bodies and not just the average body described in a textbook.

💙 If you’ve ever been told, “Your latch looks perfect, so I don’t know why it hurts,” or “Everyone finds pumping uncomfortable,” know that your experience is valid. Sometimes the missing piece isn’t your effort, it’s understanding how your connective tissue and nervous system influence the way breastfeeding and pumping feel.

Have you experienced breastfeeding or pumping differently because of hypermobility or elastic ni***es? I’d love to hear what helped you.

15/07/2026
https://www.facebook.com/share/1C7JGxsQZy/?mibextid=WC7FNe
19/01/2026

https://www.facebook.com/share/1C7JGxsQZy/?mibextid=WC7FNe

She discovered breast milk changes based on baby's s*x. Her male colleagues called it "measurement error." She proved milk is a 200-million-year-old conversation science had completely missed.
In 2008, Katie Hinde stood in a California primate research facility staring at data that made no sense.
She was analyzing hundreds of breast milk samples from rhesus macaque mothers. For months, she'd been measuring fat content, protein levels, mineral concentrations—the standard stuff. But something kept appearing in the numbers that shouldn't be there.
A pattern.
Mothers who'd given birth to sons were producing milk richer in fat and protein. Dense calories. Concentrated energy. Mothers who'd given birth to daughters were producing larger volumes with different nutrient balances—more calcium, different ratios.
The milk composition was changing based on the s*x of the baby.
Katie checked her methodology. Reviewed the numbers. Ran the analysis again.
The pattern didn't budge.
When she presented her findings to colleagues, the response was dismissive. Measurement error. Statistical noise. Coincidence.
Because if what Katie was seeing was real, it would mean something biology textbooks weren't ready to accept: breast milk isn't just nutrition. It's information.
This wasn't the Middle Ages. This was 2008—the year the iPhone 3G launched, the year Barack Obama was elected president. In modern science, we thought we understood how bodies worked.
Except we'd been treating breast milk like gasoline. Calories in, growth out. A biological formula that delivers nutrients from mother to child. Nothing more.
Katie Hinde didn't accept that explanation.
She kept going.
Across more than 250 mothers and over 700 sampling events, the story grew stranger. She discovered that first-time mothers produced milk with fewer calories but significantly higher levels of cortisol—the stress hormone.
And babies who drank high-cortisol milk? They grew faster. But they were also more alert, more vigilant. More anxious.
The milk wasn't just building bodies. It was shaping temperament. Programming behavior. Communicating environmental conditions from mother to infant through chemistry.
Then Katie found something that changed everything.
When a baby nurses, microscopic amounts of saliva flow backward into the breast tissue. That saliva carries biological signals—chemical messages about the infant's immune system, about pathogens the baby has encountered, about whether the baby is getting sick.
The mother's body reads those signals.
And within hours, the milk changes.
White blood cells increase dramatically—from around 2,000 cells per milliliter to over 5,000 during acute illness. Macrophage counts quadruple. Targeted antibodies appear, custom-designed to fight whatever pathogen the baby's saliva revealed.
When the baby recovers, the milk composition returns to baseline.
This wasn't passive nutrition delivery.
This was conversation.
A biological dialogue refined over 200 million years of mammalian evolution—longer than dinosaurs walked the Earth. Mother and infant exchanging chemical information in real time, the mother's body responding to the baby's needs before the baby even shows symptoms.
And medical science had completely missed it.
When Katie surveyed existing research, she found something that made her furious. There were twice as many published studies on erectile dysfunction as on breast milk composition.
The substance that had nourished every human being who ever lived—the world's first food, the foundation of mammalian survival—had been systematically understudied because women's biology, especially the biology of motherhood, was considered less worthy of investigation.
Katie decided to change that.
In 2011, she launched a blog with a deliberately provocative name: "Mammals Suck...Milk!" The title was designed to make people do a double-take, to draw attention to a field that had been ignored.
Within a year, it had over a million views. Parents, doctors, researchers—people who had questions science had never bothered to answer.
The discoveries kept coming.
Milk changes by time of day. Morning milk contains more cortisol to help babies wake. Evening milk contains melatonin precursors to help them sleep.
Foremilk at the beginning of a feeding is more hydrating. Hindmilk at the end is fattier, more calorie-dense.
Human milk contains over 200 oligosaccharides—complex sugars babies cannot digest. They're not food for the baby. They're food for beneficial bacteria in the baby's gut. Milk simultaneously feeds the infant and cultivates the infant's microbiome.
Every mother's milk is biologically unique—customized not just to the species, not just to the individual baby, but to the specific moment in that baby's development.
In 2017, Katie Hinde brought this work to the TED stage. Her talk has been viewed over 1.5 million times.
In 2020, her research reached millions more through the Netflix documentary series "Babies," where parents around the world learned for the first time that the milk they'd been producing was exponentially more sophisticated than anyone had told them.
Today, at Arizona State University's Comparative Lactation Lab, Dr. Katie Hinde continues transforming how medicine understands infant development. Preterm infants in NICUs receive different care because of this research. Formula companies are redesigning products to better approximate milk's complexity.
But here's what really matters.
Katie Hinde didn't just discover new facts about milk. She revealed that half the human experience—the biology of mothers and infants—had been systematically understudied because it was considered less important than male s*xual function.
She proved that the first relationship every human has—mother feeding child—is not passive delivery of nutrients but an active conversation. A transfer of information. An education in immunity and behavior and how to survive in the world.
Think about what that means. Every time a mother nurses her baby, her body is listening to chemical signals, adjusting the formula in real time, responding to needs the baby can't articulate.
It's been happening for 200 million years.
We only noticed in 2008.
And we only noticed because one researcher refused to accept that the pattern she was seeing was "just noise."
Sometimes the biggest scientific revolutions don't come from billion-dollar labs or massive government funding. They come from someone paying attention to what everyone else ignored. From someone trusting what the data shows even when it contradicts what textbooks say.
From someone willing to stand in front of colleagues and say, "I know what you think this means, but look again."
Katie Hinde thought she was studying milk composition in monkeys.
What she uncovered was a conversation 200 million years in the making—a biological dialogue so sophisticated, so responsive, so precisely calibrated to each baby's needs that it redefines what we thought nourishment meant.
She discovered that mothers aren't just feeding their babies.
They're talking to them.
And finally, we're learning to listen.

05/01/2026

Nestlé is recalling specific batches of its SMA infant formula and follow-on formula.

This is due to the potential presence of cereulide in the batches below. There have been no confirmed reports of any illness but if you’ve bought one don’t feed it to your baby.

The recall notice states you can get a refund: If you have purchased one of these batches, please share a photo of the product and the batch code via https://www.nestle.co.uk/en-gb/getintouch or by calling our careline on 0800 0 81 81 80 (UK) 1800 931 832 (Ireland) and we will refund you.

You can switch to any other first stage infant formula (if you’re using a specialised milk please contact your health professional). I’m assuming the recall means the affected batches are now off the shelves but you can double check any new purchases.

Batch codes can be found on the base of the tin or box for powdered formulas or the base of the outer box and on the side / top of the container for ready-to-feed formulas.

A list of UK products and batch numbers followed by Ireland.

You can check the Nestle website here https://www.nestle.co.uk/en-gb/media/sma-infant-formula-follow-on-formula-recall?_kx=aXTIwfnPEjd8LOiLG1ZmN73fHEcG4TmQLvNnUBOwg7c.RuSAJw

SMA Advanced Follow on Milk 800g
• 52879722AA

SMA Advanced First Infant Milk 800g
• 52319722BA
• 52819722AA
• 51240742F2
• 51890742F2
• 51450742F1

SMA First Infant Milk 800g
• 51170346AA
• 51170346AB
• 51340346AB
• 51580346AA
• 51590346AA
• 52760346AB
• 52760346AD
• 52780346AA

SMA First Infant Milk 400g
• 51350346AA
• 52750346AD

SMA First Infant Milk 1.2Kg
• 51340346BE
• 52740346BA
• 52750346BA

SMA LITTLE STEPS First Infant Milk 800g
• 52740346AD
• 51220346AD
• 51540346AC

SMA Comfort 800g
• 52620742F3
• 51240742F3
• 51439722BA
• 51479722BA
• 51769722BA
• 52049722AA

SMA First Infant Milk 200ml
• 52860295M
• 52870295M
• 53220295M
• 53230295M
• 52870295M
• 53030295M
• 53040295M
• 53070295M
• 53080295M

SMA First Infant Milk 70ml
• 53170742B1

SMA Lactose Free 400g
• 51719722BA
• 51759722BA
• 51829722BA
• 51979722BA
• 52109722BA
• 53299722BA
• 53459722BA
• 51150346AB
• 51500346AB

SMA Anti Reflux 800g
• 51570742F3
• 52099722BA
• 52099722BB
• 52739722BA

SMA Alfamino 400g
• 51200017Y3
• 51210017Y1
• 51220017Y1
• 51250017Y1
• 51390017Y1
• 51420017Y2
• 51430017Y1
• 51460017Y1
• 51690017Y2
• 51690017Y3
• 51700017Y1
• 51710017Y1
• 51740017Y1
• 52760017Y5
• 52790017Y1
• 52860017Y1
• 53100017Y3
• 53110017Y1
• 53140017Y1
• 53140017Y2
• 53150017Y1

Ireland batch numbers

SMA Advanced First Infant Milk 800g
• 51450742F1

SMA Advanced Follow on Milk 800g
• 51240742F2
• 51890742F2

SMA Comfort 800g
• 52620742F3

SMA First Infant Milk 200ml
• 53070295M
• 52860295M
• 52870295M
• 53220295M
• 53230295M

SMA First Infant Milk 800g
• 51590346AB
• 52750346AE

SMA GOLD PREM 2 800g
• 53090742F2

SMA LITTLE STEPS First Infant Milk 800g
• 51540346AD

SMA Alfamino 400g
• 51200017Y3
• 51210017Y1
• 51250017Y1
• 51460017Y1
• 51710017Y1

💕 amazing breast milk 🥰
01/12/2025

💕 amazing breast milk 🥰

In 2008, Katie Hinde stood in a California primate lab staring at hundreds of milk samples. Male babies got richer milk. Females got more volume. Science had missed half the conversation.
She was a postdoctoral researcher at the California National Primate Research Center, analyzing milk from rhesus macaque mothers. For months, she'd been measuring fat content, protein levels, mineral concentrations. The data showed something she hadn't expected: monkey mothers were producing completely different milk depending on whether they'd given birth to sons or daughters.
Sons received milk with higher concentrations of fat and protein—more energy per ounce. Daughters received more milk overall, with higher calcium levels. The biological recipe wasn't universal. It was customized.
Hinde ran the numbers again. The pattern held across dozens of mother-infant pairs. This wasn't random variation. This was systematic.
She thought about what she'd been taught in graduate school. Milk was nutrition. Calories, proteins, fats. A delivery system for energy. But if milk was just fuel, why would it differ based on the baby's s*x? Why would mothers unconsciously adjust the formula?
The answer shifted everything: milk wasn't passive. It was a message.
Hinde had arrived at this question through an unusual path. She'd earned her bachelor's degree in anthropology from the University of Washington, then completed her PhD at UCLA in 2008. While most lactation research focused on dairy cattle or developing infant formulas, Hinde wanted to understand what milk actually did in primate mothers and babies.
At UC Davis, she had access to the largest primate research center in the United States. She could collect milk samples at different stages of lactation, track infant development, measure maternal characteristics. She could ask questions that had never been systematically studied.
Like: why do young mothers produce milk with more stress hormones?
Hinde discovered that first-time monkey mothers produced milk with fewer calories but higher concentrations of cortisol than experienced mothers. Babies who consumed this high-cortisol milk grew faster but were more nervous and less confident. The milk wasn't just feeding the baby's body—it was programming the baby's temperament.
Or: how does milk respond when babies get sick?
Working with researchers who studied infant illness, Hinde found that when babies developed infections, their mothers' milk changed within hours. The white blood cell count in the milk increased dramatically—from around 2,000 cells per milliliter to over 5,000 during acute illness. Macrophage counts quadrupled. The levels returned to normal once the baby recovered.
The mechanism was remarkable: when a baby nurses, small amounts of the baby's saliva travel back through the ni**le into the mother's breast tissue. That saliva contains information about the baby's immune status. If the baby is fighting an infection, the mother's body detects the antigens and begins producing specific antibodies, which then flow back to the baby through the milk.
It was a dialogue. The baby's body communicated its needs. The mother's body responded.
Hinde started documenting everything. She collected milk from over 250 rhesus macaque mothers across more than 700 sampling events. She measured cortisol, adiponectin, epidermal growth factor, transforming growth factors. She tracked which babies gained weight faster, which were more exploratory, which were more cautious.
She realized she was mapping a language that had been invisible.
In 2011, Hinde joined Harvard as an assistant professor. She began writing about her findings, but she also noticed something troubling: almost nobody was studying human breast milk with the same rigor applied to other biological systems. When she searched publication databases, she found twice as many studies on erectile dysfunction as on breast milk composition.
The world's first food—the substance that had nourished every human who ever lived—was scientifically neglected.
She started a blog: "Mammals Suck...Milk!" The title was deliberately provocative. Within a year, it had over a million views. Parents, clinicians, researchers started asking questions. What bioactive compounds are in human milk? How does milk from mothers of premature babies differ from milk produced for full-term infants? Can we use this knowledge to improve formulas or help babies in NICUs?
Hinde's research expanded. She studied how milk changes across the day (fat concentration peaks mid-morning). She investigated how foremilk differs from hindmilk (babies with bigger appetites who nurse longer get higher-fat milk at the end of feeding). She examined how maternal characteristics—age, parity, health status, social rank—shaped milk composition.
In 2013, she created March Mammal Madness, a science outreach event that became an annual tradition in hundreds of classrooms. In 2014, she co-authored "Building Babies." In 2016, she received the Ehrlich-Koldovsky Early Career Award from the International Society for Research in Human Milk and Lactation for making outstanding contributions to the field.
By 2017, when she delivered her TED talk, she could articulate what she'd discovered across a decade of research: breast milk is food, medicine, and signal. It builds the baby's body and fuels the baby's behavior. It carries bacteria that colonize the infant gut, hormones that influence metabolism, oligosaccharides that feed beneficial microbes, immune factors that protect against pathogens.
More than 200 varieties of oligosaccharides alone. The baby can't even digest them—they exist to nourish the right community of gut bacteria, preventing harmful pathogens from establishing.
The composition is as unique as a fingerprint. No two mothers produce identical milk. No two babies receive identical nutrition.
In 2020, Hinde appeared in the Netflix docuseries "Babies," explaining her findings to a mass audience. She'd moved to Arizona State University, where she now directs the Comparative Lactation Lab. Her research continues to reveal new dimensions of how milk shapes infant outcomes from the first hours of life through childhood.
She works on precision medicine applications—using knowledge of milk bioactives to help the most fragile infants in neonatal intensive care units. She consults on formula development, helping companies create products that better replicate the functional properties of human milk for mothers who face obstacles to breastfeeding.
The implications extend beyond individual families. Understanding milk informs public health policy, workplace lactation support, clinical recommendations. It reveals how maternal characteristics, environmental conditions, and infant needs interact in real time through a biological messaging system that's been evolving for 200 million years—longer than dinosaurs.
Katie Hinde didn't just study milk. She revealed that the most ancient form of nourishment was also the most sophisticated. What science had treated as simple nutrition was actually a dynamic, responsive communication between two bodies—a conversation that shapes human development one feeding at a time.

18/10/2025

I have this theory that the menopause is there to unpick us…

Not the real ‘us’ but the versions created by society and its superwoman expectations.

The versions created by the impact of decades of fertility hormones, childbirth, mothering, or the lack of all that.

A heart broken and rebuilt a million times over and a body completely exhausted by constantly reinventing itself to fit the mould of that particular chapter.

I think the menopause strips us bare.

Not to humiliate but to eventually FREE us.

And aren’t we so very lucky now that we have such control over HOW we rebuild.

These hormones that plague us so become ours to curate and administer.

And the biggest weapon of all is ours to brandish - SHARING.

No shame, fear or symptom can thrive in the light of our shared wisdom and experience.

The power is ours, what a thing.

And I’m not for a minute daring to say that any of this undoing is easy - but show me a phase of your life ruled by hormones that was easy, my love. We know what it is to battle, you and me.

I have this theory that the menopause is there to unpick the versions of ourselves we are far too brilliant and wise for now.

And we get to rebuild in the shape of something far more fitting…

the woman we were meant to be, all along.

Donna

(If you are stuck in the throes of menopause and cannot see a way out, please train your algorithms to follow these amazing women who will remind you we are here to thrive and not just survive…)






There are so many others but this following of the above will bring many more your way. Isn’t that just the joy of an algorithm.

Donna ###

09/09/2025

A beautiful gathering of women to explore all things menopause and experience a wide range of personalised treatments. Not to be missed!

Join Jhoana- Come As You Are for her monthly sessions The Centre of Complementary Medicine- Sound baths are next level r...
26/07/2025

Join Jhoana- Come As You Are for her monthly sessions The Centre of Complementary Medicine- Sound baths are next level relaxation. Hope to see you there! 🥰

💫The next six months of Sound Bath Meditations 💫

Address

13b Dragon Street
Petersfield
GU314JN

Opening Hours

Tuesday 9am - 1pm
Wednesday 9:30am - 3pm
Thursday 9am - 4pm

Telephone

+441730231655

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Beth Forrest Osteopathy posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Beth Forrest Osteopathy:

Shortcuts

Share