16/06/2026
Can a simple tea-derived combination ease period pain? A new placebo-controlled pilot study suggests that chamomile extract paired with L-theanine may dramatically reduce menstrual pain and several associated symptoms, producing improvement.
Prior clinical research suggests chamomile may reduce menstrual pain and associated symptoms in primary dysmenorrhoea, while L-theanine has separately shown potential benefits for mood regulation, relaxation and aspects of sleep quality. However, the advantages of a combination of these two agents have not been studied until now.
This randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled pilot study evaluated a ready-to-drink beverage containing chamomile extract plus L-theanine for primary dysmenorrhoea in 30 young women (15 active, 15 placebo). The active beverage delivered 480 mg chamomile extract and 200 mg L-theanine per 240 mL serving, with participants consuming two servings daily for five consecutive days spanning the menstrual period (two days before menstruation onset and then the next three days). The placebo was not inert, but rather a chamomile-flavoured beverage matched for appearance, volume and sugar content, designed to mimic the sensory characteristics of the extract without containing chamomile extract or L-theanine.
The magnitude of analgesic benefit reported was substantial. Mean visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores fell from 6.07 to 2.60 in the active group, representing a 57.2% reduction, while numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores fell from 6.13 to 2.73, a 55.5% reduction. In contrast, placebo produced only a modest VAS reduction from 5.47 to 4.60 (approximately 16%) with no statistically significant change in NRS scores. The intervention also reduced multiple associated symptoms, including lower abdominal pain (−52.9%), back pain (−56.3%), loss of appetite (−47.2%), stomachache (−43.1%), body pain (−42.5%), irritability (−45.1%) and depressive symptoms (−49.5%). Interestingly, the placebo beverage also improved some psychological variables suggesting either expectancy effects or a possible psychophysiological influence of the chamomile aroma/flavour itself. The authors themselves acknowledged that olfactory and flavour effects from the placebo may have confounded mood outcomes.
Surprisingly, given the reputation of L-theanine, sleep findings were more modest and nuanced than the pain outcomes. Total Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores did not significantly improve, nor did sleep duration, sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances or subjective sleep quality. The only sleep parameter significantly improved was daytime dysfunction, which decreased by approximately 32%.
Mechanistically, this could plausibly relate more to reductions in menstrual pain and mood disturbance than to direct hypnotic effects. The L-theanine dose used here (400 mg/day total) was substantial and similar to doses used in some stress and sleep studies, while the chamomile dose was considerably higher than in many trials, although the extract concentration was unfortunately not reported. No phytochemical analysis was provided.
Overall, this was a promising study. However, it was underpowered, relied almost entirely on subjective outcomes, lasted for only a single menstrual cycle, and did not include a chamomile-only arm to determine whether L-theanine added anything meaningful. The placebo was also arguably active from a sensory perspective. Nonetheless, the size of the analgesic effect relative to placebo was notable and aligns with previous evidence that chamomile may exert clinically meaningful anti-prostaglandin and antispasmodic effects in primary dysmenorrhoea.
For more information see: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41525193/