13/09/2026
WHEN IS A CARDIAC PATIENT "RIPE" FOR DISCHARGE?
by Dr. Alan S.Tenerife (Cardiologist)
Social media and everyday conversations are abuzz with speculation about a prominent politician facing a plunder case who is currently under hospital arrest for his cardiovascular conditions.
People are questioning whether he needs continued confinement at the hospital and how long should he remain there before being cleared for transfer to jail.
Rather than weigh in on this heated issue, with which I do not have firsthand knowledge of the case’s specifics, I would instead like to explain how we cardiologists determine when to admit and continue treating a patient in the hospital and when we consider the patient "ripe" for discharge.
A cardiologist determines whether a patient should be admitted to the hospital by considering the symptoms, physical examination, test results, and his or her assessment of whether a serious condition may be imminent or is already present.
Consider Mang Juan as an example. If Juan’s chest pain has an anginal quality, lasts for an extended period, occurs at rest, and fails to respond to his medications, such as sublingual nitrates, he most likely has unstable angina or possibly a myocardial infarction—both of which require immediate hospitalization. Similarly, if Mang Juan is having difficulty breathing and my auscultation reveals pulmonary edema, or fluid in the lungs, I will advise hospitalization.
Abnormal findings on an electrocardiogram (ECG), troponin test, or echocardiogram may also help a cardiologist determine whether hospital admission is needed.
A patient should be admitted when the necessary tests (such as coronary angiography or others), monitoring, or treatment for his cardiac condition cannot be safely performed at home.
I once saw a patient in the clinic who was asymptomatic but was advised by a doctor to be admitted solely because his ECG showed an incomplete right bundle branch block, often a benign finding. Regardless of whether this advice stemmed from poor judgment or other reasons, it was clearly inappropriate.
When should a patient be discharged? A patient can be discharged when, after adequate treatment, the symptoms have improved or resolved, vital signs and heart rhythm are stable, and no further hospital treatment or close monitoring are needed. The decision of when to discharge a patient is not set in stone; it is based on the best judgment of the attending physician.
What if the patient is kept at the hospital longer than necessary? When hospital confinement is unnecessarily prolonged, a patient may develop serious hospital-acquired infections such as pneumonia, venous thromboembolism (dangerous blood clots from prolonged immobility), disruption in sleep, mental and emotional well-being, and a significant financial burden (unless the patient is super-rich).
The key principle is this: a physician, using his or her best judgment and objectivity, should keep the patient at the hospital only as long as the benefits of in-hospital care outweigh the risks of prolonged confinement.
A cardiologist's fear that something bad might happen after transfer or discharge does not by itself justify keeping a patient hospitalized indefinitely. Rather, it is incumbent upon the cardiologist to assess and manage the medical risk prior to discharge.
* design made by Canva
