29/04/2026
🥁 Winners of the "Development of SOPs in Accordance with Specified Requirements" Case 🥁
The VOI-2026 challenges are in full swing, and we've already summarized the results of Track #1's case, "Development of SOPs in Accordance with Specified Requirements," from Inna Vladimirovna Shadrina, a leading technologist at Active Component!
The spring educational intensive includes not only unique lectures and assignments from current specialists at leading pharmaceutical companies, but also the opportunity to ask questions and receive feedback.
📨 In addition, in the "Active Component" case, the winners and runners-up received a personal invitation to an interview🌟
So, our winners🏆, who will receive +30 points in the portfolio competition:
- Marcel Maratovich Nemeshev, fourth-year student of Biotechnology at SPbSTI (TU)
- Angelina Maksimovna Timko, fourth-year student of Biotechnology at RTU MIREA
- Ksenia Viktorovna Dolyuk, fourth-year student of Chemical Engineering at SSPhFU
Our prize winners💪, who will receive +20 points in the portfolio competition:
- Sofia Aleksandrovna Grigorieva, third-year student of Chemical Engineering at SSPhFU
- Daria Dmitrievna Kornelyuk, fourth-year student of Chemical Engineering at SSPhFU
- Evgeniya Soroka Andreevna, first-year Master's student at NUST MISIS in Chemical Engineering (graduate of SPHFU 🤫)
Daria Alekseevna Dubrovina, fourth-year student in Chemical Engineering at SPHFU
✍️ Feedback from case participant Ksenia Dolyuk: "I liked the assignment: it was practical and as close as possible to real production conditions, which made it especially useful. The case gave a general idea of how the labeling process is organized in production and how this is reflected in SOPs."
🌠 And finally, some parting words from Inna Vladimirovna:
"A huge thank you to everyone who took the trouble to work on this case!
This task perfectly demonstrated who pays attention to detail, who knows how to work with technical specifications, and, most importantly, who truly has a sparkle in their eyes. In our profession, enthusiasm isn't just a word, but the fuel for complex processes.
For those who received a low score, I advise you not to be upset and to reread the task. In pharmaceutical production, a missed section or logical gap is not just an academic error, but an unacceptable oversight.
For example, if in the objectives and object of an SOP you write about equipment labeling, but in the procedure you describe finished product labeling, this will not only confuse all plant employees but also have negative consequences during an audit: a GMP auditor will not overlook this. Any technologist's document must be coherent, traceable, and "breathe" with a unified technological framework. chain.
Working as a technologist is a delicate balance between precision in completing a given task and a touch of creativity. And yes, such specialists are worth their weight in gold today.
I wish everyone to find their "reaction space" – be it commercial production, quality control or assurance, synthesis optimization, scaling, validation, or process digitalization.
If my lecture resonated with you or left a pleasant languor somewhere between your shoulder blades, the Master's program in API synthesis will be your best catalyst for "career synthesis."
I look forward to seeing you at the factory.
Good luck, and may your yields always be consistently high and your professional path unadulterated!