06/16/2026
Support our local farms!
Avoid non-organic produce.
On February 18, 2026, President Donald Trump signed an executive order utilizing the Defense Production Act to ramp up the domestic production and secure the supply of glyphosate-based herbicides (commonly known by the brand name Roundup) and elemental phosphorus.
The administration framed the decision not just as an agricultural issue, but as a matter of national security, defense readiness, and food supply protection.
The core reasons behind the administration's approval to prioritize and boost this chemical include:
1. Protecting the Food Supply Chain
The White House stated that glyphosate-based herbicides are the most widely used crop-protection tools in U.S. agriculture, playing a foundational role in maintaining high crop yields and low production costs. The administration argued that any sudden loss of or restriction to glyphosate would severely cripple agricultural productivity, spike food prices, and threaten the overall stability of the domestic food supply.
2. Over-Reliance on Foreign Supply Chains
A major driver for the executive order was the vulnerability of the supply chain. Currently, there is only one domestic producer of elemental phosphorus and glyphosate (Bayer/Monsanto), and U.S. agricultural demand far outpaces what that single domestic entity can produce. The order asserts that relying heavily on foreign sources for these inputs leaves the U.S. vulnerable to hostile foreign actors who could cut off supply.
3. Dual-Use Military Needs (Elemental Phosphorus)
The order explicitly ties glyphosate production to military readiness because of its chemical precursor: elemental phosphorus. Phosphorus is a highly restricted, scarce material used extensively in the defense industrial base to manufacture:
Semiconductors for radar, sensors, and solar cells.
Advanced lithium-ion batteries used in weapon-system supply chains.
Military smoke, illumination, and incendiary devices.
By boosting domestic mining and processing of phosphorus to satisfy both defense tech and agricultural weedkiller needs, the government aims to close a critical national security gap.
4. Legal Protections and Corporate Pressures
The timing of the order was highly notable, arriving just one day after Bayer proposed a $7.25 billion settlement to resolve tens of thousands of ongoing Roundup cancer lawsuits. Under the Defense Production Act, the executive order grants a level of liability protection and immunity to domestic manufacturers complying with the federal directive. Analysts suggest the order was intended to ensure Bayer wouldn't halt domestic production due to legal pressures and to potentially influence pending Supreme Court decisions regarding corporate liability.
The Resulting Backlash
This directive caused immediate political friction, particularly within the "Make America Healthy Again" (MAHA) movement. Many health and environmental advocates—who supported the administration on promises to remove toxic chemicals and pesticides from the food supply—expressed deep frustration over the sudden prioritization of a chemical the World Health Organization classifies as a "probable carcinogen."
However, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. publicly defended the move, stating that putting "America first" meant prioritizing immediate defense readiness and safeguarding the food supply from foreign disruptions.
The European Union: While the European Commission renewed the overall approval of glyphosate through 2033, individual EU nations have set strict domestic limits.
Germany: Completely bans glyphosate use in public spaces, parks, and water conservation zones.
France, Belgium, and the Netherlands: Have banned all non-professional, over-the-counter sales. Only certified commercial farmers are permitted to use it; household cosmetic use is illegal.
Canada: While allowed in commercial agriculture, 8 out of 10 provinces restrict its use for "cosmetic" property maintenance, and it is banned on federal lands.
