10/19/2026
Congress wants to give athletic trainers "autonomous, unchallengeable authority" over medical decisions.
I think that's a significant step forward for our profession.
But there's a problem I don't think we're talking about enough.
Who controls the employment of the athletic trainer making those decisions?
In college athletics, particularly football, coaches can have substantial influence over who gets hired, retained, and fired within sports medicine departments.
So what happens when an AT makes the appropriate medical decision, but the coach who disagrees has influence over whether that AT is employed next season?
The Senate-passed Protect College Sports Act attempts to address medical autonomy. It would prohibit coaches from influencing medical decisions and establish additional protections for medical personnel.
But it doesn't directly address the employment structure.
And I think that's a pretty significant gap.
This week's Athletic Trainer Finder Weekly Newsletter takes a closer look at the proposed legislation, along with:
• 133 new athletic trainer jobs, 66% with published salaries.
• A college advertising $30,000 for a full-time athletic trainer.
• Four companies recruiting for what appears to be the same military contract, with nearly $20,000 separating the lowest advertised annualized pay and highest salary ceiling.
• Five positions worth considering when you account for local living expenses.
The legislation isn't law yet. But I think this is a conversation our profession needs to be having now.
Read this week's edition: https://www.atcfinder.com/post/133-new-athletic-trainer-jobs-monday-october-19-2026-congress-aims-to-protect-medical-autonomy