08/24/2026
I understand why this case is being celebrated as a win for maternal mental health.
I just donât think it is.
Because somewhere, a new mother is having a horrifying, unwanted thought about harming her baby and wondering, What if this means Iâm capable of doing it?
Somewhere else, a woman who desperately needs psychiatric treatment is reading that Lindsay Clancy was âovermedicated,â âput on 13 medications,â and âbegged for help while doctors just threw pills at her.â
And sheâs getting a little more afraid of medication.
Thatâs what worries me.
The Lindsay Clancy case involves profound mental illness, complicated treatment, changing diagnoses, medication starts and stops, retrospective reports, competing expert interpretations, and now enormous legal stakes.
That complexity has been flattened into a very compelling story:
She asked for help. Psychiatry failed her. Medication made her worse.
But a compelling story is not necessarily an accurate one.
And when weâre talking about maternal mental health, accuracy matters.
Unwanted, ego-dystonic intrusive thoughts about harming your baby can be terrifying. They do not mean you want to hurt your child or that you will.
Psychiatric medications arenât evidence that your provider isnât listening to you. Sometimes medication is the help.
Lindsay was suffering from profound mental illness while struggling with fear and ambivalence about medication. It was a common story.
Somehow, the story being told about her case will probably leave other mothers more afraid to seek the very treatment that could help them.
Thatâs not the mental health victory I want.