09/17/2026
The Covid Vaccine Exposed by the BMJ
From Coffee & Covid newsletter by Jeff Childers 9-17-2026
“Dear readers: all things considered, we have been extremely patient. It’s finally paying off. Today’s whale of a story confirms more legacy ‘conspiracy theories,’ and further puts the lie to what is beginning to look like the most deceitful political organization in human history. (Which is saying a lot.) We begin at the storied British Medical Journal, the gatekeeping “gold standard” of science, which occasionally stirs itself to actual journalism. Yesterday, it quietly published the result of its own investigation, written by a Pulitzer-winning health reporter, based on new disclosures, titled, “US officials knew covid vaccine safety system was flawed—but turned aside the FDA doctor who alerted them.”
In short, the BMJ just exposed the latest statistical shell game the Biden “public health” agencies played, fooling all of us rubes into thinking they gave millions of shots and saw no unusual safety signals in their data. For instance, in April, 2021, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky said, “We have not seen a signal (for myocarditis), and we’ve actually looked intentionally for the signal in the over 200 million doses we’ve given.”
“That was false,” the article stated simply. They weren’t looking intentionally. They were looking with the lights off.
“US officials embraced an algorithm for detecting signals of harm from mRNA covid-19 vaccines,” the BMJ reported, “that they knew was broken and suppressed efforts to fix it.”
Allow me a quick moment to explain how they did it. It wasn’t particularly complicated.
💉 For ages, the FDA’s signal-detection system compared VAERS reports from any new vaccine to the other VAERS reports from different vaccines. It was a closed loop. But the Covid mRNA jabs produced so many reports it completely swamped the database of all previous vaccine adverse events. Over 90% of 1.1 million adverse event reports in the first year were reports from the covid shots. (You might call that a signal of its own. The FDA didn’t.)
So when they used their only statistical sampling method, it was basically just comparing Pfizer to Moderna and vice-versa. Thus, like the dosimeter in HBO’s Chernobyl that maxed out at 3.6 roentgen— no signals. In April, 2021, the CDC’s VAERS safety page reassured jab-takers that, “VAERS has not detected patterns in cause of death that would indicate a safety problem.”
Think of it like this. Let’s say Camel and Marlboro came out with a new type of cigarette using artificial, self-replicating to***co. Before the launch, the FDA had a few hundred adverse reports over the years from natural ci******es. But then the new fake ci******es produced hundreds of thousands of reports. When you compare Camel against “everything else,” it is really just comparing it to Marlboro.
That’s bad enough. But the BMJ, reviewing newly disclosed internal FDA and CDC emails, found that they knew all about the data-flooding problem. “We were aware of this data mining limitation before and during the pandemic,” the FDA’s safety chief Narayan Nair wrote in a 2023 email to colleagues that the BMJ reviewed. They knew about the problem before the pandemic!
The FDA scientist who built the original data-mining system tried to alert everyone, and even developed an accurate way to sample the massive VAERS data to detect safety signals more accurately than simply comparing the two jabs. They shut her down…
If it proves nothing else, the BMJ story1 proves the wisdom of the founders. The Constitution tried to limit the federal government to a few narrow enumerated powers like controlling the border, levying international tariffs, the military, and running the post office (badly). When it dabbles in things like public health and charity, what happens? Lies. Massive fraud. Cover-ups.
When it “helps” us with mandatory retirement schemes, what happens? A broke Social Security system. When it “serves” us with regulated healthcare plans, what then? American life expectancy that trails Costa Rica. When it “protects” us from environmental poisoning, what do we get? Regulated backyard puddles. When it “assists us” with evening the playing field, what happens? Diversity, equity, and inclusion. When it “advances” us by funding science, what result? Gain-of-function research in Chinese labs and a global pandemic.
In what extra-constitutional realm has the federal government ever unequivocally succeeded? Color me skeptical. I welcome the debate.”
1 BMJ link
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__substack.com_redirect_779a497b-2D9451-2D40bc-2D8ebf-2Df7de9c9a495e-3Fj-3DeyJ1IjoicGkwMGsifQ.VrSXDdcnvb15EMFVJ3bH5bqOVODQSHGJ-2Db1zed7UUC0&d=DwMFaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=znGHx0JUEc21M43Ez8350RuJ3X8shftXCmLrLuhsbPQ&m=O_OpEIYoeS4LTvTWTQe_-4lzPLNOKk-ITvkO1jkrd5OoREfD1r0RTiJFkuFFzEnr&s=57BP1M0_mk-lgan3dYLKDmcTdphX48qjHrso9JQipDI&e=
