05/29/2026
Heart rate variability (HRV) has become one of the most popular metrics in health and longevity, but it’s also one of the most misunderstood.
One of the most common questions I hear is: “My HRV is only 35. Is that bad?”
The answer is usually: compared to whom?
Unlike blood pressure or fasting glucose, HRV does not have a single “optimal” number that applies to everyone. Age, s*x, genetics, fitness level, training status, sleep, alcohol intake, medications, illness, and even the device being used can influence the value.
A healthy 25-year-old endurance athlete may have an HRV of 100.
A healthy 55-year-old woman may have an HRV of 30.
Both can be entirely normal.
What the research consistently shows is that lower HRV is associated with reduced autonomic flexibility, poorer recovery, and increased risk of a variety of chronic diseases. Higher HRV is generally associated with greater physiologic resilience. But the key word is generally.
HRV is not a diagnosis. It is not a report card. And it is certainly not a competition.
What makes HRV useful is its ability to provide context over time. A sudden drop from your normal baseline may reflect accumulated stress, inadequate recovery, illness, poor sleep, increased training load, or simply the realities of life. Likewise, gradual improvements often accompany better fitness, sleep, metabolic health, and recovery practices.
This is why I rarely compare one person’s HRV to another’s.
Instead, I ask:
Are you trending in the right direction?
Are you recovering well?
Are you becoming more resilient?
HRV is best viewed as a compass rather than a score. The goal is not to chase someone else’s number. The goal is to build a body and nervous system that can adapt, recover, and thrive.
Because resilience, not perfection, is what ultimately supports longevity.
Stay North.