09/02/2026
♿️ UPDATE ♿️
Pratt Park, 1621 S Florence Ave, Tulsa, OK
This is where Inaccessible Tulsa began, July 3, 2024, Pratt Park.
Just around the corner from Pratt, we were renovating a house for wheelchair accessibility. When we eventually downsize, the proximity to the park was part of our grand scheme: picnics, fresh air, and sunshine with little effort.
Checking in on the construction at the house that summer, we decided to take a stroll to Pratt Park with our daughter in her wheelchair. We were floored by what we found: a significant wall and steps on the west side, houses on the north and south, and a steep, unpaved incline on the east. We literally could not enter without an all-terrain wheelchair.
To no avail, we contacted City of Tulsa 311, the parks department, two City of Tulsa councilors, and other City of Tulsa offices. (We will share the correspondence at some point for the purpose of advocacy. The approach was thorough and well-documented, but the effort exhausting.)
Told that it was slated for accessibility in 2032 – the Americans with Disabilities Act 34 years old in 2024 – did not make for a happy mother: “I could be dead by then.” Our daughter was living on borrowed time due to her stroke, and Mom and Dad not getting any younger.
This video represents the outcome of over two years of advocacy. There is now a path into the park to a new park bench and a new concrete slab that holds a new accessible picnic table.
But then there’s this new park swing. It is surrounded by an impenetrable concrete ring. (You will see this at many City of Tulsa parks but typically with a way in.) In this case, there is no accessible way to go from the path to the swings.
That’s our grandson swinging. His aunt can’t join him.
It’s been a lifetime of this: fighting for her rights to be included rather than relegated to watching from the outside, or excluded altogether.
Is there a plan to fix this? Can it be properly remediated? Likely. But when? 2032?
Here’s the broader question: Was providing accessibility and inclusion part of the City of Tulsa’s plan, or was it a poorly executed afterthought? The concrete truck had already come and gone.
Overcoming the dismissive attitudes at the City of Tulsa is the hard part, not the bit of concrete that is necessary to provide access to the swingset.
What say you, City of Tulsa? When will federally mandated compliance with Title II of the ADA be embraced? We’re waiting.